At the end, Max is just a man, what can he do against a bean?

Are they even going to hold elections?

People didn’t even shower daily a few hundred years ago. Hornyness makes anything possible.

That said healthy people don’t get that bad usually.

The memes are funny but I find it disturbing that there are people that actually think these two compete in any way.

God forbid devs be excited for something.

Just say you are gay, it’s fine.

What do you think is different between Scottish people and Lithuanians? If anything at all

The US, specially internationally, has always been a fascist regime.

Work from home or check the company’s dress code before applying. But as most have said: if your presented gender matches the “expected” one for wearing skirts, you’ll never face problems doing so, unless you want to work at a factory or something.

Do you prefer hanging out with the reactionaries?

I was referring to the Prince of Wales. It suffered from a lot of technical problems and lack of escorts, but apparently they turned it around. Supposedly.

Isn’t their only carrier unable to actually engage in any operations due to lack of escorts and/or crew?

Nope, it’s either right click or the goddamn scroll that fails.

The problem is that the current definition makes no sense and is, frankly, bad.

400 people, for a huge scientific community like astronomy, is bad. Heck even if they were literally all the astronomers in the world, the fact that it was proposed and voted on basically the same day should be noteworthy at the very least.

And no one here is angry. I was just pointing out that name calling for no reason doesn’t really add to the discussion, even a low stakes one like this.

That’s not what I said? You can have both. You are the one closing yourself to art with subtext.

People say a lot more than what their words mean all the time. Having that in art is just part of being made by people.

It’s because the definition includes things that aren’t really about the object itself and more about where it is. And also how inconsistent it is, as Mercury isn’t in hydrostatic equilibrium and yet is explicitly included as a planet by the IAU. Nevermind the fact that the new definition was speed voted and approved by less than 400 astronomers in a convention where 2500+ people attended, let alone not even being discussed with the larger scientific community.

But hey, if you’d rather dismiss my points because of an url, you do you. Not like this changes our everyday live anyway.

Except when you actually read about the change in Pluto’s status and how unscientific it actually is.

They must have reached the conclusion that their surface fleet would just be a liability, it makes no sense to waste resources on this. But then again, they haven’t been able to stop the war in Ukraine so it’s unlikely they could do anything to China any time soon.

Every single “evidence” I’ve ever seen of this genocide ended up as hoax (remember the meat truck?), so I think it’s pretty safe to say it isn’t a thing.