Most of the obvious choices will be posted so I’d like to give a shout-out to tuna and red onion, it sounds wrong but is surprisingly moreish!

I just wanted to say that you shouldn’t be getting downvoted. You’ve asked a question that isn’t editorialised, appears to made in good faith and asks the opinions of others.

You’ve prompted some very good answers here.

It’s an uncomfortable question, but a question that appears to be made in good faith and OP shouldn’t be getting downvoted. I do not see the benefit of “burying” this question and the many well written answers in this thread show that.

Pedant

This is an engineering question and engineering questions almost always come down to “do you have enough time and money?”

Since the time scale is two weeks, we only need to know if the Israel had enough resources (bull dozers, wrecking balls, bombs, personnel etc. I don’t have that information, but it doesn’t sound impossible. If a man can be put on the moon, a city could be bulldozed in two weeks.

foiled again by quick lemmers

There’s a post from two days ago saying tomatoes, you weren’t foiled, you just didn’t bother to read the comments before posting.

One of my favourite things about super was to see the original Goku character come back. A goofy and loveable guy that’s a savant when it comes to fighting and just wants a bigger challenge.

Hercule. Not only is he fucking hilarious but without him the fights against Cell and Buu would have been lost.

In the Cell games he showed incredible bravery to throw 16’s head over to Gohan, enabling Gohan to hear the words he needed to go super sayin 2.

In the Buu saga, he befriended a monster, he showed kindness and compassion that was nearly able to end the fight before it even started. This later caused the good and evil buu’s to split. Without Hercule, Goku would not have been able to power up the spirit bomb that finishes Kid Buu.

If you’re going to dump it at the side of the road, why bag it?

I find naming your car to be so cringe. You wouldn’t name your TV or your washing machine. . .

The apple cider vinegar gets fruit flies but the house flies just aren’t interested.

I make my own hot sauce, which is chillies (any variety or mix of varieties that you like, I usually have mostly fairly hot with a few absolutely mental ones thrown in to take it to the next level), just enough cider vinegar to get things moving in the blender and about 2% the chillies weight of salt. Blend until smooth. Good hot sauce is sooooo expensive and absolutely not worth it if you can make your own.

I can’t go back to store bought chilli mayo now that I know how easy it is to make.

Add to mayo, hot sauce (to taste) and Cajun seasoning (to taste) and stir until homogeneous. So much cheaper than store bought and better tasting too.

We ought to ban joke answers from the community. It’s pretty crap having to search for the actual answer in a sea of non helpful answers.

I think whether anyone approves of it or not is really irrelevant. People have bought and sold sex for thousands of years and will continue to do so.

The only questions is whether you think the sex trade should be illegal or stigmatised. My personal opinion is that criminalising sex work is a fools errand and that it’s no ones business if two consenting adults want to trade money for sex.

The starting gun has already fired. Don’t be idle and wait for life to come to you, you need to go get it!

Possibly, or maybe your comment wasn’t well written enough.

Because we can debate all-day about what is a man or a women or non-binary and gender roles etc. But I would say debating what is a male or female is much easier and simply comes down to genetics.

Edit: imagine getting down voted for saying XX chromosomes are female and XY is male haha, I guess we’re just ignoring the science of genetics now

That’s absolutely not what I’m saying and I don’t appreciate the insinuation.

There are very few women chess players at the top level of the game. The reasons for this are debatable, it could simply be that women are less interested in chess or that women are put off by a male dominated “sport”, but I’ve also heard that men are much more likely to have a specific type of autism that makes them especially suited to doing well at chess.

I’m absolutely open minded to the idea that women can become top level chess players and that women’s titles could be made redundant, but I think it’s reasonable to see the evidence of this before we say that it’s an equal playing field for both sexes. I’d suggest that we should see a decent proportion of women in the top one hundred players of the world, or even the top two hundred and fifty.

Given the current ranking of chess players, it’s really hard to say that women have the same chess ability as the men and I absolutely don’t want that to come across as sexism, it’s just factual.

https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml