Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml to Memes@lemmygrad.ml · 8 days agoWhen?lemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down14
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageWhen?lemmygrad.mlSaymaz@lemmygrad.ml to Memes@lemmygrad.ml · 8 days agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squareComradeSalad@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoThis interpretation is actually out of date and no longer accepted by modern historians.
minus-squarepronounced ɱɐɢ @lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoGood to know. It was the one I was taught in school, so I went with it.
minus-squareComradeSalad@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoThat’s fair. If I remember the interpretation was only recently rejected when some historians bothered to go back and actually ask, “Wait, why did we think this again”? Lmao Everyone sort of just accepted the assertion for about 300 years.
This interpretation is actually out of date and no longer accepted by modern historians.
Good to know. It was the one I was taught in school, so I went with it.
That’s fair. If I remember the interpretation was only recently rejected when some historians bothered to go back and actually ask, “Wait, why did we think this again”? Lmao
Everyone sort of just accepted the assertion for about 300 years.