Name one thing that can’t land you in prison in the US. I’ll wait.
deleted by creator
Even convicted pedo can avoid prison https://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/justice/delaware-du-pont-rape-case
You don’t even need that first part. Being rich makes it 10x harder for you to be prosecuted.
Being white
Everything, as long as you’re the president and say it was an “official act”…
Seems like what’s needed is the ability to load an alternate profile or some kind of demo mode based on the pin. Something that looks normal but doesn’t have any info you don’t want others to see, without actually deleting anything.
I had this feature on a Xiaomi phone that i had a few years ago. I could even set up the fingerprint reader to open a different profile depending on which finger i used.
Sounds awesome.
You can already have multiple independent users in graphene (maybe in stock android too idk). You have to switch them before the possible search though.
this is what peak democracy™ looks like, dont be fooled
If the phone’s security prevents them from accessing information, then they have no information. How can they prove there was any information on it to begin with?
And that person is the officer that destroyed the evidence
BS. It’s a claim from last year and not only in Spain, that criminals often use encrypted phomes (logical), among others, Graphene OS, but also iOS and Android. Not that all who use encrypted devices (or message apps) are criminals, which due the amount of these devices result absurd to say. As often, periodists write and share half understood news. In Spain as also in the rest of the EU, phones and messages of individuals can only be intercepted by the police with a court order in a criminal investigation, not globaly like in the US. There may be cases when an individual under criminal investigation deletes incriminating messages, which can be punished for concealment of evidences.
deleted by creator
What a coincidence that it was the guy protesting the police who was also suspected of possessing such materials. If it turns out they had real independent grounds to suspect he had such images, I’ll change this view, but for now I assume that’s the cops’ standard line to shut down people’s questions. Just say they thought the political target had CSAM, and immediately people see him differently, plus the police can accuse anyone who challenges their actions of supporting pedophiles.
Sounds like bs without any definitive proof
How do you know if phone got erased?
