• freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    @mozz@mbin.grits.dev Regarding our prior discussion from months ago about the effect of sanctions on Russia and on Europe, I think this particular piece from the BBC is highly relevant and also has the benefit of time away from our initial discussion to show a bit of a trend, don’t you think?

  • beaxingu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    because producing war materials is propping up the economy in the short term. its a war economy but producing shit to blow up so too use up is not something that will be a benefit in the long term. sanctions is something that works over the long term and that need to be adjusted over time.

    • blterrible@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Also, when your economy is doing so poorly it’s easy to do better. When your economy is doing well, it’s more difficult to improve.

      Mathematically, if I give a naked homeless person with no worldly possessions a sandwich, they have infinitely more wealth. It’s still just a sandwich though.