• frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    5 days ago

    I found this morsel particularly poignant:

    "Ironically, Meta expected rights groups to be too busy to step in, given the disastrous geopolitical climate.

    “We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads, as quoted by the NYT."

    • racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      “if such a dynamic political environment fails to come, the corporation will spur on dynamism by sponsoring alternative dynamic groups from within the country whenever possible” Shock Doctrine at its best

    • Gathorall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      And I used to think the “secret dastardly plan diary” -files scattered around in Resident Evil and the like were silly B-movie stuff that obviously would not be written down in the real world.

      But no, they’re assigned in company strategy meetings and politicians just hit their sex slave supplier on Gmail with “Heya yo haave sum tasty kiids to fuck in Cali thiss wekend?”

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just need to associate ray bans with creeps moving forward. If they are too far away to tell, just assume it’s a fucking weirdo in Meta glasses. Forever associate the brand with creepy weirdos, and maybe they’ll rethink their strategy.

  • SleepyPie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Please reach out to your family and urge them to stop using Facebook (or worse, any form of reels) if they still do. The onus is on the informed now. It’s not enough to just ask the tech barons to stop, we also need to divert their support.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    A dude wore these to a club I was at. Not easy to notice unless you’re looking for them. He was creeping on people showing skin and was a known stalker for one of the dancers in particular.

    Fortunately he got kicked out unceremoniously.

    asshole perverts will always find ways to ruin things for everyone else, but these glasses just make it way too easy.

  • qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “Pervert Glasses” = AI glasses

    (For doomscrollers who don’t read the articles)

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      well considering that most AI is used to create child porn (looks directly at Grok)… pervert glasses seems like a very good description of these “glasses”.

        • TransNeko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          tuere is a cesspool of proof. but posting links to it would get me banned. I wanna puke after seeing how many different “legally compliant” AI either don’t have child checks… or have instructions telling you how to disable said child checks.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s a couple of people on SM I follow who use them.

      There’s a street photographer called Bleg who always explains to people that he is using them to record the interaction.

      Another is a guy that feeds several cat colonies on his mail route (first class whiskers) so he can use both hands to stroke and feed the cats.

      Another is a guy called AsamaPOV that visits small family run restaurants in Japan and like the first guy, always explains and asks permission.

      They’re examples of nice people but the scope for abuse is so wide

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      When google glass first debuted, I was thinking how much easier my job could be if I could have the faces of the people authorized to enter in that device to make admission easier (there were over 300 faces to remember that didn’t have to use their issued ID due to position), as in, when a person approaches if they were in my “PRIVATE ON DEVICE” database their access card would display on my screen. Never got one, thankfully. This new tech would be great for this except I doubt that there would be an offline mode, so I see no use case for this unless you want to assist in the tracking of people for Meta.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    since when do we need experts for this? what we need is laws. it’s unbelievable that they’re even allowed to do this shit.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Are they that terrible or is this mostly a corporate propaganda campaign against Facebook? We’re all on every camera and microphone pointed in our direction 24/7 already because ppl couldn’t figure out we shouldn’t turn every nation into a corporate surveillance state.