• 0 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 10th, 2021

help-circle







  • There’s a couple of people on SM I follow who use them.

    There’s a street photographer called Bleg who always explains to people that he is using them to record the interaction.

    Another is a guy that feeds several cat colonies on his mail route (first class whiskers) so he can use both hands to stroke and feed the cats.

    Another is a guy called AsamaPOV that visits small family run restaurants in Japan and like the first guy, always explains and asks permission.

    They’re examples of nice people but the scope for abuse is so wide





  • what’s the helmet situation in other countries, especially around ad-hoc rental scooters? I see scooters and bikes for rent here, but no buckets to wear, and I wonder the legality of that too.

    Outside of Australia, helmets are not mandatory and data from there shows it has had a negative effect on not only the numbers of cyclists, reducing “safety in numbers” but also an increase in children with head injuries, because drivers are less risk adverse (“Mary Poppins effect” - drivers give more space & make less dangerous passes around cyclists in everyday clothing).

    The most simple solution to increasing cyclist (and pedestrian) safety is to build better infrastructure. Design roads so that vehicles have to slow for junctions and roundabouts, especially where there’s mixed modal traffic. Prioritise active and public transport over inactive modes. Make cycle, walking & bus routes more direct and make driving routes more circuitous. Discourage driving into town centres and stop building out of town retail parks.

    Back to the topic in hand:

    If anyone wants to claim that “helmets save lives” then why aren’t they advocating them for vehicle passengers, who experience greater numbers and severity of head injuries than cyclists, or for pedestrians who have about the same number, possibly slightly more than cyclists?








    • signal to noise ratio

    It feels a bit like how Reddit was prior to the digg exodus when overnight pun & lyric threads, ascii art and terminally shit one word responses appeared.

    There is the awareness to the benefit of building slowly will bring, rather than having a an uncontrolled mass exodus, that risks little to no integration to the current curated culture.

    • Transparency

    You can see who the mods are and a mod log and currently, people are giving time to grow the communities rather than welding power.

    • Quality content

    It’s not the same stories getting posted by karma farmers or by bots. It’s more curated.

    • Interactions

    They’re more conversational than adversarial


  • And if you paid any attention to those reports, you would know that the vast majority are where those people have been critical of the UK or other govts actions, especially surrounding Palestine and none have gone further with the exception of Asa Winstanley. The only reason the police have visited those people is because zionist like complaining about nothing until they get their own way.

    The one that the commentor here was responding to was a clear case of inciting violence. The same with people like the constantly crashing out Graham Lineham, who was arrested by police because he was inciting violence against a protected class.

    So while the UK govt is infringing on peoples free speech, its not the ones who are getting all the publicity. Theyre just a bunch of whining fuckwits who want to be able to threaten people without consequence.

    Please do try to keep abreast of the situation rather than stomping in with big boots and looking like a fucking idiot.