• TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I haven’t compared it myself but xbps is supposedly much faster than portage for binary packages. I know it ain’t really an important metric but still.

    I think void has better binary package support though. I don’t have the statistics but it seems that still not all gentoo packages are offered in binary form, especially on arm or legacy x86. I also think GURU is source only which is sometimes an issue when installing some obscure software.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      GURU is source only

      Is void different? Does it have a user repository that provides binaries directly?

      My familiarity is with AUR, which does not provide the binaries directly. I suppose you can write a PKGBUILD that only installs a binary, but you could do the same with ebuild.

      On binary support, I imagine you’re right. Binary support in gentoo is new. I imagine it will only get better.

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        well my point was that obscure software is “often” (in my experience) packaged only in GURU, while void has official packages. My guess is that it is because GURU is official-ish while void has no such thing so there is bigger “pressure” to build binaries.

        • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I didn’t look much into void, but when I did, gentoo’s repository is much larger and there are many packages that I’d call obscure that happen to be in the main repos.

          The situations I’ve had to reach to guru are rare. I bet that gentoo has more obscure stuff in its main repo, though I don’t have the numbers to prove it.