• Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    GURU is source only

    Is void different? Does it have a user repository that provides binaries directly?

    My familiarity is with AUR, which does not provide the binaries directly. I suppose you can write a PKGBUILD that only installs a binary, but you could do the same with ebuild.

    On binary support, I imagine you’re right. Binary support in gentoo is new. I imagine it will only get better.

    • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      well my point was that obscure software is “often” (in my experience) packaged only in GURU, while void has official packages. My guess is that it is because GURU is official-ish while void has no such thing so there is bigger “pressure” to build binaries.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I didn’t look much into void, but when I did, gentoo’s repository is much larger and there are many packages that I’d call obscure that happen to be in the main repos.

        The situations I’ve had to reach to guru are rare. I bet that gentoo has more obscure stuff in its main repo, though I don’t have the numbers to prove it.