• Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The first thing that came to my mind is that a DMCA takedown on GitHub doesn’t stop them from using it, but only from sharing their own additions with the world.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But sharing code is when a license like LGPL really has an effect in what you must do to comply…

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Everyone is free to edit, compile and use LGPL licensed code however you want on your PC. A DMCA can’t stop that, so it won’t make sense for someone to think that. At the time you share software (as a binary which used that LPGL licensed code, or the code itself) is when you are legally compelled to follow the license (hosting code on github).

            • Vincent@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ah right. So I guess my point was: the DMCA takedown doesn’t necessarily force them to publish the code on GitHub, although luckily in this case they did end up doing that.

                • Vincent@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah exactly, suing them for non-compliance would be more effective, though of course, also more effort. That said, it sounds like in this case, just asking them would’ve worked as well, which is a lot less effort 😅