You always seem to poke your head in to make a strawman or some other absurd point against any meaningful alternatitive to capitalism. That’s why I asked.
If you killed him while he was in power, it could be seen as self defense, which is legitimate. If you had him in captivity, he’d certainly deserve the death penalty but I’m against the death penalty and that applies without exception.
Read my edit. A fascist on the loose equals dead innocents. And Lyudmila would know, she watched them kill twenty four million people in her country for the crime of being the wrong kind of European. There is no coexistence with nazis, because their exterminationist ideology precludes it. You either stop the threat or it kills everyone, no middle ground. Every dead fascist is self defense.
You always seem to poke your head in to make a strawman or some other absurd point against any meaningful alternatitive to capitalism. That’s why I asked.
Someone said they want to murder lots of people. I said murdering people is bad. Yeah, totally a strawman.
Revolution isn’t the same as just killing random people. It isn’t difficult to comprehend that.
Killing non random people is also bad. It shouldn’t be difficult to comprehend that.
Lol are you five? Killing powerful fascists is an objective good for humanity, and allowing them to live is an objective harm
If you killed him while he was in power, it could be seen as self defense, which is legitimate. If you had him in captivity, he’d certainly deserve the death penalty but I’m against the death penalty and that applies without exception.
Read my edit. A fascist on the loose equals dead innocents. And Lyudmila would know, she watched them kill twenty four million people in her country for the crime of being the wrong kind of European. There is no coexistence with nazis, because their exterminationist ideology precludes it. You either stop the threat or it kills everyone, no middle ground. Every dead fascist is self defense.
Killing fascists is a good thing, actually.