that article is so stupid because even in bourgeois economics the money still went to the shop where said food was bought, so the only way for this to badly affect the economy is if they grew from home…

I thought our previous lunch habit (avocado toast) was singlehandedly ruining our ability to buy homes, thus ruining the economy. I guess I must be able to afford a home now since I bring my lunch to work. Also if a business can’t make it in the market shouldn’t it just fail?

This is laughable even by the logic of bourgeois economics. The profits enjoyed by said restaurants would just be diverted towards supermarkets selling produce that become ingredients in their lunch - much of which shares the same supply chains said restaurants use. I guess this is a “both sides-ism” but for capitalists themselves lol

deleted by creator