Was surprised no one bothered to post this give how big of a reaction this story got.

Wanted to post the update and correction cause that deserves to be seen just as much. This seems like a reasonable, thoughtful handling of the issue.

I still don’t really wanna use Ubuntu though 😅

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    Note that both the community council and most moderators are volunteers not employed by Canonical.

    i wish i could understand why people would volunteer their time for a for-profit corporation.

  • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Why the fuck does an operating system have ANY rules relating to queerness?

    • Cris@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Edit: why are y’all downvoting them for being out of the loop?? Lemmy get your shit together


      They don’t- a moderator to an online ubuntu forum community (that recently became official) misapplied a rule about keeping things apolitical as meaning someone shouldn’t describe themselves as queer.

      Ubuntu has made a statement correcting the interpretation made by the moderator

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Isn’t everything political these days. So you’d be able to talk about nothing.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ubuntu has a diversity policy to explicitly welcome and encourage participation, mentioning that they explicitly honor diversity in sexual orientation among other things. It does not explicitly mention queerness.

      A moderator made a bad a call. It sounds like there may have been some confusion about the word queer used as a slur vs a self-identification.