You must log in or register to comment.
Typical physicist, ignoring enthalpy of phase changes. Starting from 1C defrosted makes a huge difference from 0C as the melting takes up a ton more energy/slaps. Their underslapped chicken would give you salmonella
Also completely neglecting that not all the energy in a slap will be transferred to thermal energy in the chicken.
Assume a spherical chicken…
They haven’t considered rate of slap. Significant heat transfer to environment even at 10 slaps per second.
They’re also assuming sea level standard atmospheric conditions. You may need to reduce rate of slap at altitude.
Slap the salmon
🤔
Lord have mercy on folks cooking their chicken to 400 F. Those birds will come out as dry as the sands of the Sahara.
https://youtu.be/hzMzFGgmQOc?t=285
“well done steaks. if I see a speck of red, it’s going back. you better cook my food”.
Signed, a well done meat enjoyer.
I mean, false equivalency, don’t you think? I have yet to meet an enjoyer of medium-rare chicken, probably because the Salmonella or Listeria already took them out
205°C 😂😂😂
Common sense and physicists are common enemies
I confirm this as a physics PhD. I also understand exactly this thinking of assuming a system is in thermal equilibrium where it is far from it (like a chicken in am oven).
Maybe they like their chicken fucking black
So has anyone who’s actually cooked a chicken before done the math? Because my guy just slapped this poor bird into pure carbon. Did he mean to do 205°F? It’s still too high, but it would at least be edible.
But how do you get the chicken back from the stratosphere once you’ve slapped it that fast?
You start in the stratosphere and slap it down towards the Earth.
Better to slap it twice at half strength so that it’s cooked when you catch it.
Lmao
His number are off due to the idea that chicken is cooked at 400F. Yikes!
At this point we have to consider the ambient temperature as well, as the chicken will slightly cool between two slaps once it exceeds it
Assume the chicken is spherical an in vacuum.
Fucking nerds in the commentsl love it
No one’s going to point out the absurd starting assumption KE=mcT??
Where’s the link to the YouTube video where someone tried this? I remember listening to it last time someone posted this.
What if I wanted to cook the chicke through friction, by say inserting an object 3 fingers or so thick in and out of its cavity as fast as athletically possible? … so um… how long can I keep fucking my chicken?
alternatively, how long do I have to keep choking my chicken to cook it?
Math says it’ll take more than 2 minutes, so unfortunately it’s out of reach for you
So, how many slaps to cook Stephen Miller?
This is why AI will take all of our jobs. Oh well, as long as we can.
Excellent, physics in service of humanity!
How fast does it cook in a vacuum?
to my knowledge these calculations pretty much have to be assuming a vacuum. IE there’s no mention of heat loss between slaps. which would be inevitable as 23k instant slaps, would take considerable time.
I’d suspect it doesn’t cook so much as, y’know, explode and dessicate
