• d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Good to see devs willing to do the work needed in order to draw hard lines on the capitalist leeches that divert money away from the project. I am looking forward to the traffic system that they mentioned as a future option. Would allow users that are okay with turning on those features for adding crowdsourced traffic data and stuff like marking cops posting up to get their quotas.

    Literally the only thing that keeps me on Waze is that stuff. I have to deal with a lot of interstate travel to and from work and knowing that a big crash happened so I can re-route before getting stuck is crucial. I will still make sure to have this installed just like I had Organic Maps as a good option. And to see what stuff I go to that needs to be updated on OSM and StreetComplete. Had to add all of the addresses on my street on OSM a while ago just to be able to correctly enter my address. One of those addresses that is listed as one town for mailing and is technically within the borders of a smaller one with regards to utilities and plots of land.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      The problem is if nobody uses it, there won’t be any data.

      • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        True, but if the option to start using it isn’t there. Then it also won’t have data to even get started. I remember when I first started using Waze back on my Galaxy S3, it wasn’t super helpful (for both the traffic and in some cases the map data). This was mostly due to it not being used by many people in my state at the time (the friend that told me about it used it in a much larger city with more “tech” people around). So even if it doesn’t help me directly right away, I am more than happy to start using it daily to report what I can.

    • rocci@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Magic Earth is open source and has traffic/crowd sourced stuff like Waze

      Edit: Sorry guys, I don’t know why I thought Magic Earth was open source. Really looking forward to this if they get traffic data in there!

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      This meme format makes me sad ever since I learned that the blonde woman was outed as being severely physically abused by her husband here.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      U’d love to use Osmand on a daily basis but the map renders so slow for me that it becomes hard to use. Zooming out to then wait 10+ seconds is annoying. I still use it frequently but for everyday tasks I swotched to Omaps/COmaps.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Will there be an alternative to StreetComplete? An Apps that lets you contribute to CoMaps instead of Organic Maps?

    edit n/m. I found out that StreetComplete contributes to OpenStreetMaps.

  • lewdian69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    What was the benefit of Organic Maps over OsmAnd or other options? I never understood why Organic Maps was getting so much traction.

    • Joël de Bruijn@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      OM and for now CoMaps are faster and easier to learn. For most people. With OSMand configurations are endless and people tend to get lost in them. Also the map data of OM is highly filtered OSM data. Meaning smaller files and a faster app.

      The downside is less features, but as always … if you dont need the absent features … its a plus.

      Now whats interesting how they both will keep it that way. My theory is when they listen to EVERY wish from random users (with other persona and user stories) they eventually become like OSMand too.

    • teolan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Organic maps (and now comaps) have a much better rendering engine. It’s much faster, while also being much more legible. It’s routing engine is also faster.

      OsmAnd does have the upper hand when it wcomes to features though. I have both and use OsmaAnd when I need to export a route to GPX or see relief.

    • sunstoned@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      For me its the android auto compatibility. OSM won’t (and probably shouldnt) jump through the google hoops to do so. It’s at least nice to have a more open option for an otherwise very proprietary ecosystem. Even though organic maps has room to improve

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Organic maps has traffic, osmand doesn’t. I feel osmand is better in pretty much every other situation but organic maps has traffic.