• Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    https://archive.is/20240220003112/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-19/china-vows-to-centralize-tech-development-under-communist-party

    Archive of the full article.

    This is rational from China’s perspective. Divesting in the American technology pipeline not only weakens America’s grip on the global economy but also positions China as the leader in global technology.

    Also, we have more evidence of US putting back doors into technology than we do China. If you’re living in the imperial core, it’s far more likely that the US is monitoring your activities than China is.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Nothing makes that more clear than how quickly the US dropped their bullshit accusations of DikDok once it was under their control.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Looking forward to my purchase going towards R&D for new tech and not just some CEO’s coke/CSAM addiction.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well I mean Germany did it too? Unless you’re asserting that Germany wasn’t a capitalist.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nobody’s capitalist, or communist for that matter. Both of these are mythical ideals that nobody has ever managed to implement at any large scale.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure, if you base your politics in idealism instead of materialism, which isn’t a very useful lense for analyzing politics.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Exactly, though I would say there are some ideals that are more realistic than others. I think the whole debate between communism and capitalism is largely a distraction from actual tangible change that can be achieved and sustained.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s still capitalism when the government does things. It’s not a mix of capitalism and socialism or whatever, it’s just capitalism because what matters is who is in control. Under capitalism there is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, the owners of capital. Hence, capital-ism.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Under capitalism, corporations take over the government and use it to their own ends. Under communism, the government takes over the corporations and uses them to it’s own ends. Either outcome ends up looking pretty much the same.

                What we have in the west, especially America, is far more than just “the government doing stuff”. Government power and corporate power have become nearly indistinguishable. Corporations don’t make long term investments of any kind without government grants to ensure consistent steady profits. We are constantly at war, and those wars consistently serve corporate interests.

                On the other side, every large scale implementation of Communist ideals has resulted instead in state capitalism.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  No, every implementation of a communist state (or even a vaguely leftish state) is ruthlessly hunted down and destroyed by capitalist powers - chiefly the United States.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Under communism, the government takes over the corporations and uses them to it’s own ends.

                  No, that is Leninism. Not communism. Those groups called themselves communist, communist party, communist Republic etc. But we’re not communist in any significant sense beyond nominally.

                  Replace every time you mention communism with Leninism or ML and I largely agree however. Russia evolved into fascism. China is absolutely state capitalist. North Korea 100% a dictatorial nepo-state. But not because of communism.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Plenty are capitalist. True no one will ever achieve the capitalist ideal. Because capitalism amplifies and encourages the worst of human behavior. Without offering any controls for it. Capitalism is absurdist by it’s very nature.

          While it’s true no nation has ever achieved ideological communism either. Thats because it requires post scarcity. Which strictly speaking we don’t have yet. And directly requires us to address the worst of human nature. It simply isn’t currently achievable. But there are plenty of things we could do to move towards it that we aren’t and should be doing. But can’t, in the United States for example. Because wealthy oligarchs and authoritarians have invested heavily in miseducation and propaganda.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I would argue that post scarcity is something that we could actually have today if it were a priority. Most of the work people do today is entirely unnecessary. What’s left could mostly be automated if that were a priority. Instead, what we see is consumer demand expanding to demand more and more stuff, and the majority of the workforce being employed in scams to help their employer collect power coupons.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I disagree. But you aren’t that wrong. We could claw back the theft of capitalism and absolutely provide a comfortable standard of living for almost everyone. But there are absolutely some big road blocks. Energy and food demand in particular. But we are rapidly approaching some significant milestones on those fronts. Cell cultures/lab grown meat, advancements in fusion. But again if we don’t address the problem that is capitalism. Those things will be hamstrung and used to fleece regular people all the more.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I didn’t say that we actually are post scarcity, only that we could be if that were society’s priority. Take away all the useless work, and that doesn’t leave a whole lot to require coercion. Most of our food production is already pretty much automated, and most of the rest would be if coercion was taken off the table.

                I don’t share your optimism on fusion, but that’s not very relevant since there are other technologies that I see as long term solutions. We also waste tons of energy, for instance Bitcoin alone is estimated to account for 2% of US electricity use.

                I don’t think it says much for communism as an economic system if all the economic problems have to be resolved before it becomes possible.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think we can expect to see a future where a lot of Chinese computing is done on RISC-V. They will not have any need for American technology companies, b/c we don’t do the manufacturing anyway. We just have the IP for entrenched technology. Americans were too short-sighted with all that trade war, Nvidia GPUs, and Huawei stuff. Why wouldn’t your biggest trading partner take that as a warning sign that they must foster their own tech sector?

    Also, when you can truly plan for longer terms than fiscal quarters or, if you’re being really ambitious, fiscal years then I don’t see how you can’t just eventually dominate the sector.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not that you could before, but I wouldn’t trust any chips, hardware, software, anything made from there from a security stand point anymore.