The Privacy Iceberg

This is original content. AI was not used anywhere except for the bottom right image, simply because I could not find one similar enough to what I needed. This took around 6 hours to make.

Transcription (for the visually impaired)

(I tried my best)

The background is an iceberg with 6 levels, denoting 6 different levels of privacy.

The tip of the iceberg is titled “The Brainwashed” with a quote beside it that says “I have nothing to hide”. The logos depicted in this section are:

The surface section of the iceberg is titled “As seen on TV” with a quote beside it that says “This video is sponsored by…”. The logos depicted in this section are:

An underwater section of the iceberg is titled “The Beginner” with a quote beside it that says “I don’t like hackers and spying”. The logos depicted in this section are:

A lower section of the iceberg is titled “The Privacy Enthusiast” with a quote beside it that says “I have nothing I want to show”. The logos depicted in this section are:

An even lower section of the iceberg is titled “The Privacy Activist” with a quote beside it that says “Privacy is a human right”. The logos depicted in this section are:

The lowest portion of the iceberg is titled “The Ghost”. There is a quote beside it that has been intentionally redacted. The images depicted in this section are:

  • A cancel sign over a mobile phone, symbolizing “no electronics”
  • An illustration of a log cabin, symbolizing “living in a log cabin in the woods”
  • A picture of gold bars, symbolizing “paying only in gold”
  • A picture of a death certificate, symbolizing “faking your own death”
  • An AI generated picture of a person wearing a black hoodie, a baseball cap, a face mask, and reflective sunglasses, symbolizing “hiding ones identity in public”

End of transcription.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just tell the normie that you have nothing to say if you have nothing to hide. Also, why there’s no F-Droid?

  • PeteWheeler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thanks for providing this. It is obvious you put a lot of time into this. Truly appreciated. I will have to look into these.

    How did you find these yourself?

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      How did you find these yourself?

      I’ve been learning about privacy for the better part of 6 years. At first, most of my information came from lurking on Reddit and Lemmy, but then I started getting first-hand experience and doing my own research.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was disapponted at that, I spooled up one of those instances a few months back and its federated and is magical. If only I could convince my family to move away from that old group text grumbles in person who cosplays as a sysadmin

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably because people above the waterline don’t know Mozilla exists, and people below have seen how things have been going lately.

      • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They do perhaps know, Firefox did have about 27%+ of the market at one point and people outside of the USA are more likely to know about it. Nevertheless, FF is currently about 3.25% of the total browser base. That is still about 160+ - 200+ million users.

      • candyman337@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Firefox is really bad a portraying what they’re actually doing, and the privacy concerns people have with them have been widely overblown. But on top of that librewolf is a privacy oriented fork not made by Mozilla

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think this is the first time I’ve seen an iceberg meme with sources and explanations for each item. Fantastic. Your work is appreciated.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      To be honest, and it wouldn’t work here, but I sometime enjoy the cryptic nature of iceberg memes at the lower ranks. It’s like a scavenger hunt.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “As seen on TV” does not imply privacy, it just implies a large advertising budget. These are software that market themselves as private (and are sometimes better than nothing at all) but may still be just as bad as software on the tip of the iceberg.

  • neuroneiro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Was going to say links or it never happened but you provided them! And categorized by level! Excelsior!

    Thanks also to the comments giving more information.

    So grateful for this platform. For the most part.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Using basic things like Graphene OS and keepass shouldn’t be considered privacy activist

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Calling GrapheneOS a “basic thing” when 99% of people will never touch their OS is a bit of a stretch.

  • mmhmm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was at the bike shop a few weeks back and a ghost walked in. He came in wearing a medical mask covered by a bandana, sunglasses, cap. They wore gloves, long sleaved pants and shirt.

    First question from staff, ‘this a robbery?’

    Ghost, ‘no, I just need 27 2.5 tubes, miss.’

    They get the tubes, he agrees. Staff asks if he has an account. Ghost says, “nope, why would I need one?” Staff says they do it for records, insurance claim assist, and discounts. Ghost goes with a John Doe, pays cash and peaces the fuck out.

    Total King, but dude was given up a lot. Half of us were drinking beers enjoying a warm evening in spring. I hope he has had some good rides.

    I can say with confidence thay he was a white male. In his 50s. About 5’10". 140 lbs-ish. If anyone wants to get any tips, good luck!

  • hummy_bee@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also, I am out of the loop? What’s up with firefox? I have used it on linux mint for maybe 6 years now with uBlock. Currently trying to use DuckDuckGo as default browser because that Google AI results thing is starting to annoy me.

    • Philzlaus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m a big fan of Duckduckgo, since Im using it for a couple of years. The search results have become much better compared to the past.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s fine. For legal reasons (particularly in the EU and California) they had to add a Terms of Use fit the browser, and the had to translate a bunch of broad, idealist, simple phrases into legalese so they wouldn’t get killed by those governments.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Weird how Apple and iMessage are not in the same category. How do distrust apple’s privacy claims but trust iMessage?

    • edel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      True. Apple would need a category on its own, but if i have to choose would place it on “As seen on TV”.

      It is fairly private and they quite give a fight about maintaining that status. There are no cases I am aware off they comply to open the system for authorities publicly and if so, they do not claim encryption anymore (as per UK.) Now… the key word is publicly; If I were a zealous top intelligence agency I would not force Apple to break an account for me so to obtain evidence on an individual so I can present it to a judge… for me Apple or Protonmail (or any other popular encrypted service really) would be far more valuable a place where I quietly could obtain intel on tens of thousands of targets and with that find other ways to find evidence if need be. It is a good sacrifice for the sustainability of the scheme.

      Of course, this is just a thought and no evidence has been brought up. Apple is a large company and some whistleblower could easily popup if that were the case… yet again, having the right tight team is easy to keep it undercover, specially in a closed sourced software. The fact that the US is eyeing so many encrypted SaaS but Apple, with its omnipresence reach, is almost always left alone is a bit odd.