Without revolutionary theory, there can be no revolutionary movement.

— V. I. Lenin

In the dying capitalist hellscape we occupy, it can often seem hopeless. However, a better world is possible. We can move on from the destitution, genocide, and privation of today’s society and move onto one where we consciously decide to take a scientific approach to production. We can direct society in such a fashion that satisfying the needs of the people is the goal of production, and not satisfying the bottomless avarice of a handful of billionaires. What we need is socialism. What we need is Marxism-Leninism.

Who is this guide aimed at?

Anyone wanting to begin their journey into the world of leftist theory and organizing.

How long will this guide take to follow?

Aimed at about 60 hours of active reading time. This can be stretched out over a year, or condensed into a few months of hard study, depending on your availability.


Section 0a: The Case for Marxism-Leninism [4hr 19 min]

In the 21st century, with global capitalism in crisis, now more than ever an alternative is needed. Why should we look to Marxism-Leninism, specifically?

  1. A. Einstein’s Why Socialism? | Audiobook

[20 min]

From the unique scientific perspective of a legendary physicist, the case for taking a coordinated, planned, and scientific approach to production and distribution.

  1. R. Day’s Why Marxism?

[26 min]

The case specifically for Marxism-Leninism as the basis of social organizing and revolutionary practice.

  1. M. Parenti’s “Yellow Parenti” Speech

[1 hr 33 min]

The importance of revolution in uplifting people’s lives across the 20th century.

  1. M. Parenti’s Blackshirts and Reds | Audiobook

[2 hr]

A litany against anti-communist mythos, an examination of the real successes and struggles in the USSR, and an analysis of fascism.


Section 0b: Self-Education [15 min]

When beginning to study a new subject, it’s important to frame why studying said subject will be useful, as well as how best to go about studying.

  1. Ho Chi Minh’s Why Do We Have to Study Theory?

[11 min]

Practice alone is insufficient for developing a solid understanding of effective methodology.

  1. N. Krupskaya’s General Rules for Independent Study

[4 min]

Best practices for how to get the most out of study, through active engagement with theory.


Section 1: Fundamentals of Marxism [2 hr 6 min]

Let’s begin with some gentle overviews to form a base to build upon in the later sections.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism | Audiobook

[10 min]

The core fundamentals of Marxism.

  1. F. Engels’ Principles of Communism | Audiobook

[1 hr 11 min]

The FAQ of communism. Quick to read, and easy to reference.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s Karl Marx: A Brief Biographical Sketch with an Exposition of Marxism

[~45 min]

A history of Karl Marx and the framework he created.


Section 2: Philosophy [6 hr 17 min]

By far the most critical subject to firmly grasp within Marxism-Leninism is the philosophy of dialectical materialism, the main tool by which Marxist-Leninists interpret the world so as to more effectively change it.

  1. G. Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy | Audiobook

[2 hr 46 min]

A gentle and thorough introruction to dialectical materialism and how it came to be.

  1. Mao Zedong’s On Practice & On Contradiction

[2 hr 16 min]

Directed towards guerilla fighters of the People’s Liberation Army, this pair of essays equip the reader to apply the analytical tools of dialectical materialism to their every day practice.

  1. T. Weston’s Introduction to Marxist Dialectics

[~1 hr]

An in-depth exploration of the fundamentals of Marxist dialectics.

  1. K. Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach

[15 min]

Spend some time using what you have just learned, and actively engage with each of Marx’s 11 theses here. This is the true germ of dialectical materialism, and proper study avoids falling into vulgar materialism.


Section 3: Economics [3 hr 37 min]

The Law of Value is the bedrock of the Marxist analysis of capitalism. Understanding how it is that capital behaves and functions will help us identify its contradictions, which we can exploit.

  1. N. Frome’s An Extremely Condensed Summary of Capital

[20 min]

A basic introduction to the Law of Value. By no means a replacement for Capital, but will suffice for now.

  1. K. Marx’s Wage Labor and Capital | Audiobook & Value, Price and Profit | Audiobook

[2 hr 17 min]

Best taken as a pair, these essays simplify the most important parts of the Law of Value.

  1. I. P. Wright’s Marx on Capital as a Real God

[~1 hr]

An unorthodox approach to analyzing capital as a material expression of control systems.


Section 4: Scientific Socialism [6 hr 12 min]

Scientific socialism takes an analytical approach to development and class struggle. We aim to understand the laws governing development so that we can become the masters of production, and develop in a planned fashion.

  1. F. Engels’ Socialism: Utopian and Scientific | Audiobook

[1 hr 32 min]

Engels introduces scientific socialism, explaining how Capitalism itself prepares the conditions for public ownership and planning by centralizing itself into monopolist syndicates and cartels.

  1. K. Marx’s Critique of the Gotha Programme

[47 min]

Dissects a weak socialist program and elaborates on the dictatorship of the proletariat, as well as the early socialist stage and higher communist stage.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s The State and Revolution | Audiobook

[2 hr 8 min]

Further analyzes the necessity of revolution and introduces the economic basis for the withering away of the state.

  1. H. P. Newton’s In Defense of Self-Defense

[10 min]

The working class must be able to defend itself from violent reaction, it can’t jump from state to non-state overnight.

  1. N. Frome’s How is it to be Done?

[20 min]

What does building socialism in the real world actually look like? How do we get from capitalism to socialism to communism?

  1. R. Day’s The Case for Socialized Ownership

[23 min]

Highlights the importance of collectivized and planned production from an economic, scientific, and efficency standpoint.

  1. Deng Xiaoping’s Marxism is a Science

[40 min]

The struggles and contradictions in existing socialism, and the process of building to higher and more developed stages, can only be accomplished by taking a scientific and analytical approach.

  1. N. Frome’s So You’ve Decided to Abolish the Value-Form. Now What?

[12 min]

Addresses competing interpretations of the Law of Value with respect to the transition from capitalism to communism.


Section 5: Colonialism [16 hr 14 min]

Understanding the ongoing national liberation movements in the global south, as well as the problem of settler-colonialism, is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of modern empire.

  1. Ho Chi Minh’s The Path Which Led Me to Leninism

[4 min]

Decolonialization is fundamental to Marxism-Leninism.

  1. F. Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth | Audiobook

[4 hr 48 min]

A Marxist understanding of nationalism in the global south.

  1. J. Katsfoter’s To Stop Marx, They Made Zion

[22 min]

The genocidal history of the settler-colonialism of Palestine, from its origins to today.

  1. J. Sakai’s Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat

[~7 hrs]

Analysis of the dark, bloody history of settler-colonialism in the US Empire.

  1. P. Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed | Audiobook

[4 hr]

A fiery pedagogy for those wretched of the Earth.


Section 6: Imperialism [8 hr 48 min]

Capitalism didn’t collapse in Europe, it found new ways to survive, chiefly by exporting capital. This current protracted evolution of capitalism into imperialism is the primary contradiction facing the global march to socialism.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism | Audiobook

[2 hr 39 min]

The formation of imperialism, as well as general characteristics of its behavior.

  1. K. Nkrumah’s Neocolonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism

[4 hr 39 min]

Over time, imperialism has managed to export the bulk of the contradictions in the global north to the global south.

  1. Cheng Enfu’s Five Characteristics of Neoimperialism

[~1 hr 30 min]

The characteristics of the moribund US Empire, and its use of the dollar to dominate the global south in the current era.


Section 7: Feminism [2 hr 3 min]

The historic oppression of women needs to be recognized and fought against.

  1. H. P. Newton’s The Women’s Liberation and Gay Liberation Movements

[6 min]

All sections of the working class must uplift each other, and not use homophobia or misogyny against capitalists, as it attacks our comrades as well.

  1. A. Kollontai’s The Social Basis of the Woman Question

[45 min]

A Marxist counter to the existing bourgeois feminist movement, explaining why feminism needs Marxism, and Marxism needs feminism.

  1. Combahee River Collective’s Statement

[~30 min]

An exploration of the state of the feminist movement and the importance of intersectionality as it relates to combatting oppression.

  1. J. Freeman’s The Tyranny of Structurelessness

[42 min]

Throughout the history of feminist struggle, the struggle against formalized organization has been counter-productive and led to less efficient effort and increased problems with elitism, while groups with formalized structures have had far more success and open dialogue.


Section 8: LGBTQIA+ [4 hr 22 min]

We must correctly push for queer liberation, unflinchingly.

  1. L. Feinberg’s Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink or Blue

[2hr 39 min]

When different social groups fight for liberation together, they are emboldened and empowered ever-further.

  1. V. Storm & E. Flores’ The Gender Accelerationist Manifesto

[~40 min]

Breaks down the basis of misogyny, transphobia, and homophobia from a Marxist perspective.

  1. N. Frome’s The Problem of Recognition in Transitional States, or Sympathy for the Monster

[63 min]

Trans liberation and communism go hand-in-hand.


Section 9: Party Work [5hr 12 min]

You can’t build communism by reading it into existence. Roll up your sleeves, and get to work.

  1. J. V. Stalin’s The Foundations of Leninism

[2 hr 2 min]

Marxism-Leninism is the living and evolving Marxism that has tested theory to practice for over a century.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s What is to be Done? (Abridged)

[70 min]

The fundamental tasks of the revolutionary party.

  1. Liu Shaoqi’s How to be a Good Communist | Audiobook

[~1 hour]

If we are to be successful, we must work to better ourselves, and do good party work.

  1. Liu Shaoqi’s On the Party: Concerning the Mass Line of Our Party

[~30 min]

The mass line is the fundamental tool of maintaining a direct link between the working class and the vanguard, without falling into tailism or commandism.

  1. Liu Shaoqi’s On the Party: Democratic Centralism Within the Party

[~30 min]

Democratic centralism turns an amorphous but radicalized working class into a solidified force to overwhelm its enemies. It takes the greatest strength of the proletariat, its mass, and aligns it in a unified direction.


Section 10: Self-Conduct [2 hr 39 min]

We cannot be dogmatic, or let the perfect socialism in our heads be the enemy of socialism in the real world.

  1. V. I. Lenin’s “Left-Wing” Communism | Audiobook

[1 hr 47 min]

As organizers, we must do our best to engage where the working class is at, and not let the perfect socialism in our heads be the enemy of our own practice.

  1. J. Manoel’s Western Marxism Loves Purity and Martyrdom, But Not Real Revolution

[17 min]

Marxism in western countries is often clouded by those who seem to only support socialism that failed, the “pure” socialist movements unsullied by the very real struggles involved in building socialism over a lengthy period of time. This perfect vision of socialism in our heads becomes not just the enemy of our practice, but also that of socialists in the global south that fought and died for a better world.

  1. Zhou Enlai’s Guidelines for Myself

[1 min]

Simple and straightforward virtues for any good cadre.

  1. Xi Jinping’s Water Droplets Drilling Through Rock

[4 min]

Tenacity is what creates valleys and shifts mountains. Through our connected struggle, even if the odds seem overwhelming, we all contribute to bringing about a better world.

  1. Ho Chi Minh’s On Revolutionary Morality

[~30 min]

We must combat the notion of putting self-interest above that of our collective struggle. It is through collaboration that we emancipate all, not just ourselves.


Conclusion

Congratulations, you completed your introductory reading course! Now, if you haven’t already, get organized. The Party for Socialism and Liberation, Freedom Road Socialist Organization, and Red Star Caucus are all good Statesian options. Pick whichever decent org is most active in your area regardless of where you live.

Be industrious, and self-sufficient. Take up gardening, home repair, tinkering. It is through practice that you elevate your knowledge. Learn self-defense. Get armed, if practical. Be ready to protect yourself and others. Try to use FOSS if you can. Go vegan!

We will win.


Resources

a. Theory

ProleWiki - A robust library and wiki for Marxism-Leninism.

Red Sails - “Woke ML-MZT Criterion Collection with home videos thrown in”

Comrade’s Library - Excellent source for .epubs

Qiao Collective - Connecting western diaspora with Chinese political commentary

b. Podcasts

Blowback - Anti-imperialist podcast about the crimes of the US Empire.

Rev Left Radio - Marxist-Leninist podcast centering theory, history, and current events

c. News

Liberation News - PSL’s newsletter

Fight Back! News - FRSO’s newsletter

Naked Capitalism - Economic newsletter centering capitalism’s decay


Credits

  • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What do you think about adding Manufacturing Consent and Consequences of Capitalism by Noam Chomsky? I think they both explain both the current media situation and realities of global capitalism very well without the need of reading previous theory.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Chomsky is a bit of an interesting conundrum. On the one hand, the conclusions and processes laid out in his analysis of Capitalism, especially with respect to the media and how it operates to prep the public for dramatic action and shift narratives is incredibly valuable. However, his analysis of Socialism is unfortunately incredibly anti-Marxist, and this extends to perpetual misanalysis of Socialism as it exists in the real world, often using “State Capitalism” to refer to Socialist States. As a consequence, including his works can backfire if not read with a strong understanding of Socialism beforehand to separate the golden nuggets from the nonsense, so to speak.

      To that end, I actually think Michael Parenti’s Blackshirts and Reds does a decent job of pointing out the role the media plays in Capitalist states, and absolutely nails modern Capitalist Imperialism, all while being realistic about AES due to his Marxist leanings. Here’s one of his most famous quotes:

      During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

      If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

      -Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds

      I appreciate your input, though! What do you think about the list overall?

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think Chomsky’s view is similar to Richard Wolff’s when it comes to concepts like State Capitalism. From what I’ve gathered, it relates to the relationship between the owners and workers. In state capitalism, there is still an authoritarian relationship between the owners or board of directors and the workers. The main difference is that the business is owned by the State, I’ve heard Wolff also call this Authoritarian Socialism. I’ve noticed both Chomsky and Wolff differentiate this from a socialist relationship, where the workers are also the owners in a democratic organization of the business, where this socialist relationship can be in either the Private sector or the State. This differentiates both Private and State Capitalism from Democratic Socialism, where the socialist relationship is present all forms of business both State and Private.

        I don’t think this makes their works anti-marxist. While Chomsky may use a different definition of Socialism as discussed above, he has a very detailed analysis of how Capital Interests, especially since the implementation of neoliberalism, have affected the material conditions of the working class and atomized social organization. I think the main difference is that Chomsky does not see revolution as inevitable, but he still has a focus on how resistance and organization is necessary to overcome the power of global capitalism. I think it’s quite Marxist, but within the framework of the American Empire.

        From that quote it looks look like Blackshirts and Reds does touch on the interplay between media and capital. But I think Manufacturing Consent both goes into much more detail for the whole scope, from Imperialists interests of the State down to individual media consumption, and also much more relevant to the media landscape facing the American and Western public today.

        Marv Waterstone in Consequences of Capitalism does a fantastic job detailing the realities and effects of Global Capitalism in every aspect of today. From how it affects Imperialism on the global scale, to the environment and the Climate Catastrophe, to how it affects and has atomized the everyday worker.

        They give an incredible amount of context about the current state of Capitalism, the current state of the working class, and a framework of organizing and resistance.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m familiar with how Wolff and Chomsky differentiate what they refer to as “authoritarian socialism” or “State Capitalism” and “Democratic Socialism,” but this is a deviation from Marx. Where Wolff and Chomsky define Socialism as “Workplace Democracy,” Socialism in a Marxist sense is more about Public Ownership and Central Planning in the hands of the working class, and dominance over Capital and thus the bourgeoisie. The fact that there are central planners does not mean there are distinct class dynamics, in fact Engels illustrates this quite well in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific:

          When ultimately it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself superfluous. As soon as there is no social class to be held in subjection any longer, as soon as class domination and the struggle for individual existence based on the anarchy of production existing up to now are eliminated together with the collisions and excesses arising from them, there is nothing more to repress, nothing necessitating a special repressive force, a state. The first act in which the state really comes forward as the representative of the whole of society – the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society – is at the same time its last independent act as a state. The interference of the state power in social relations becomes superfluous in one sphere after another, and then dies away of itself. The government of persons is replaced by the administration of things and the direction of the processes of production. The state is not “abolished”, it withers away.

          Chomsky and Wolff advocate for a sort of “worker-owned Capitalism.” A form of Market Socialism, if you will. This is again a deviation from Marx. Where there is competition, there is centralization, such a system would regardless trend towards eventual public ownership and central planning. Engels spends the entirety of Anti-Dühring arguing against such a cooperative-focused system as an inevitable return to Capitalism, and therefore an inevitable turn towards Public Ownership and Central Planning anyways.

          Of course, that doesn’t mean a Socialist system would not have Private Property, or Markets, just that the Proletariat would be dominant and by extension the Public Sector would have dominance over the Private, for as long as Markets are still a useful tool for developing these large syndicates ripe for central planning. The Marxist method is Dialectical Materialism, it recognizes that Capitalism itself prepares the way for Socialism, once the Working class is in charge it can gradually wrest from the Bourgeoisie the large business syndicates it creates, but only by the degree to which they have formed. From the Manifesto:

          The essential condition for the existence, and for the sway of the bourgeois class, is the formation and augmentation of capital;[43] the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage-labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by their revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.

          The sort of “Market Socialist” approach is a deviation from Marxism.

          Finally, that also ignores the very real democratic structures in Marxist states. I do recommend you read the essay Why do Marxists Fail to Bring the “Worker’s Paradise?” It’s important to contextualize AES states, their successes and failures, properly. For further reading, Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan is a good historical account of the Soviet Democratic System, warts and all.

          I know this comment was long-winded, but I do hope that encourages you to read the first couple sections at least of my reading guide, if nothing else but to give a different perspective on Socialism.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah, I haven’t done much indepth reading of Marx yet so I wasn’t aware those were considered deviations. That makes sense. Overall I still agree with their deviations, I think they are reasonable and applicable to the current situation we’re in. I also agree with you and the works of Engles and Marx that is workplace democracy is not the end-all-be-all solution and that it will inevitably have to change one way or the other, either towards communism or regress back to capitalism.

            I still stand by that Chomsky’s works are worth reading for people who are interested in and learning about socialism. It’s relatively digestible, easy to start, informative about our current situation, and I think the concept of workplace democracy is the most applicable method for people to resist the current state of the world dominated by Capitalism. I also agree with you that it’s best if not taken alone and better paired with the works of Marx, Engles, ect. But I do think it’s a great starting place for most people. Especially since most people still think of capitalism as simply ‘markets’ and ‘free trade’ and socialism/communism as ‘bread lines’ and ‘gulags’ which is of course far removed from the reality.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              I appreciate your input, however I do want to state that I think it’s important for you to also read Marx if you want to stand by the deviations from Marx. The largest economy in the world, for example, is run along Marxist-Leninist analysis and principles, even if you disagree with individual policies the mere fact of the PRC’s unprecedented rapid development due to Socialism can’t be denied nor ignored.

              Workplace Democracy is in no way a bad thing by itself, but is insufficient, and moreover extremely difficult to achieve in a Capitalist system regardless. Revolution remains more practical and more likely as Capitalism and Imperialism continue to crumble and decay.

              I think a great step for you with respect to Marxism is to study the first 2 sections in my reading guide, if nothing else. You don’t have to move beyond it, but specifically the concept of Scientific Socialism, or looking at where Capitalism is naturally going and trying to wrest control of it directly, is a massive step up from your current model of trying to simply resist within the framework of a system that is already heading towards collapse.

              Thanks for your time!