• tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      What is so hated about snaps? I’ll admit I haven’t used Ubuntu since they started using snaps, but I don’t understand the hate about them in the Linux community.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can’t host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open.

        Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

        • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

          I agree but I think it’s the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              This is a stupid argument. In FSF’s eyes even having nonfree repository (ie. for drivers) is bad so this is completely irrelevant for anyone considering flatpak or snap. Both have nonfree stuff in there.

                • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m not arguing whether snap or flatpak is better. Flatpak is better.

                  But your arguments are going against each other. You disagree that FSF should tell you what software you can use but then you want to tell other users what software they can use. If you use flatpak despite of FSF’s opinions, you should let people use snap despite of your opinion.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Honestly, why enable this kind of behavior in any way? Any user is free to make an informed choice by installing it themselves.

            We all know how this goes. Once a critical mass is reached, enshittification begins to milk everything dry. By making it an installer option, you’re legitimizing it and supporting a worse future for the Linux desktop.

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ok but KDE has official Snap packages so they already are “legitimizing it”. Also snap won’t be able to entshittify anything. Snapd is still open source, so you can just repackage the software for different package system.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                My guy. There is no open backend for Snap. If Ubuntu enshittifies Snap, nobody can host an alternate backend for them. How does the client being open source help you?

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Burn Snap out of there and I’m in.

    Edit: looks like they’re not putting much towards snaps, it’s mostly Flatpak and systemd-sysext. I’m good with that.

  • eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This article is far too hypey. One dude has started this initiative and needs people to work on his concept to get it off the ground. I’m not opposed to a red-hat free immutable system, but this one is so far from maturity this article is selling a first drawing like an almost finished product. Remind me in two years how this went.

  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The distro is designed to be a bulletproof, highly user-friendly operating system that showcases the best of KDE technology—a system that KDE can confidently recommend to casual users and hardware manufacturers.

    So it looks like there will finally be a distribution that Windows, Mac, and ChromeOS users can jump to and just start using without having to learn much and with a much better and more familiar GUI than GNOME.

  • Quail4789@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Everybody’s bashing snaps but you can literally package drivers as snaps. If you don’t think that’s cool af I don’t know what is.

    • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      99% of people don’t understand anything about Snaps except from thinking they’re worse than Flatpak

  • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think gnome is working on the same sort of thing, read here.

    I’m glad to see both going for an immutable os with flatpaks. It’s so much more user friendly for the average person and if you are more technically inclined distrobox makes it a breeze to use it like a regular linux desktop.

    I hope both do well

  • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ooo damn that sounds exactly what I’d like to try.

    On the other hand I feel like I’m too old for this shit. My system works fine, I understand everything, and things rarely break and never in an unrecoverable way.

    • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The beauty/advantage of Linux Eco-system is one can pick and choose based on his/her preferences.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe they’ll fix the sddm custom theming? It’s currently broken on all immutables and doesn’t allow custom themes.

  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I use Fedora KDE but this one sounds like exactly what I need. I primarily use Linux for software dev and web browsing and Windows for gaming and Office.

    • hessnake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fedora Kinoite exists already. It’s my daily driver for dev and gaming and works great for me.

      • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I use normal KDE because I don’t know how much of a hassle it would be to put everything in containers and use flatpaks for everything.

  • Leaflet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Makes sense that it includes snap given that KDE officially supports their apps packaged as snaps, unlike Gnome.

    If I recall correctly, aren’t they going for an Arch base? I assume they’re going to be enabling AppArmor so that the snap sandboxing is mostly working, except for the patches Canonical have failed to upstream so far.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ingl, this sounds like exactly the thing I want. Immutability aside, this is how I use EndeavourOS right now, but more sophisticated.

    I’m sold on it.