• it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It is very cool, specifically as a human readable mark down / data format.

    The fact that you can make anything a tag and it’s going to be valid and you can nest stuff, is amazing.

    But with a niche use case.

    Clearly the tags waste space if you’re actually saving them all the time.

    Good format to compress though…

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I disagree, with a passion.

      It is soooo cluttered, so much useless redundant tags everywhere. Just give JSON or YAML or anything really but XML…

      But to each their own i guess.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t mind xml as long as I don’t have to read or write it. The only real thing I hate about xml is that an array of one object can mistaken for a property of the parent instead of a list

    • Gremour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      YAML for human-written files, JSON for back-to-front and protobuf for back-to-back. XML is an abomination.

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        YAML is good for files that have a very flexible structure or need to define a series of steps. Like github workflows or docker-compose files. For traditional config files with a more or less fixed structure, TOML is better I think