• MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Until a viable alternative is presented, I doubt Discord will die anytime soon. Part of the problem is people have a hard time accepting that even if you make the best meal in town, you’ve gotta get people to step inside before they’ll try it. To an extent, this does involve winning a popularity contest of sorts if you want Discord to die.

      I think often times folks are torn between enjoying a space/app as is, and making compromises to attract a larger group. IMO Linux has the same issue and that’s part of why die hard fanboys get so aggressively defensive when this is brought up.

      It’s the software equivalent of being the bitter "nice guy" that simultaneously wants to attract a girlfriend (users) but is kind of an asshole to women. You might think you don’t stink but please wear deodorant.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah i also don’t think it’s dying hence the plea. But thing is, i don’t want alternative. I want this shit to die so i never want to see “join our discord” spammed absolutely everywhere when i want to get some info on anything.

      • Wave@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        There are viable alteratives, but they aren’t making money and can’t advertise. Signal is a prime example, its an amazing platform with feature parity + more to Discord. Regardless of how well a platform is polished, you need users. People will use the shittiest platform ever if it has users (Twitter and Reddit come to mind).

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Signal isn’t an alternative to Discord. I use both and they’re used very differently. Group movie watching for example is pretty easy on Discord.

          Digg had users and people jumped ship to Reddit because it was better.

          • NostraDavid@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            people jumped ship to Reddit because it was better.

            People jumped ship because Digg turned into complete and utter garbage, and Reddit wasn’t completely awful. It was a weird site though, 100%.

            Digg would’ve been fine had they not forced Digg v4 on users.

          • Wave@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            You can screen share on signal so that argument makes absolutely no sense. and people down voting me without explaining why are probably too stubborn to switch away from discord.

            • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              That’s a feature that was implemented what, 1 or 2 years ago when Signal’s been around for a decade?

              You can’t possibly expect people to just jump from one social app to another that has such a relatively small user base and little familiarity. Entire Discord servers would have to jump ship and it would just be a nightmare for most people.

              What Discord prioritizes, Signal treats as an afterthought. Things like group chat, video chat, GIF usage, etc, Signal has never really prioritized.

              Discord’s mobile and PC apps both allow users to select GIFs within the application, whereas only Signal’s mobile app allows users to select GIFs within the application and Signal’s desktop app doesn’t allow for in-app GIF selection. If you’re reading this thinking "who tf cares about stupid stuff like that?", you’re completely missing the point because regular ass users care about stuff like that and they totally will say “fuck that” to an alternative if it doesn’t have features like this. Why doesn’t Signal incorporate in-app GIF selection for its desktop app? I’m sure it will be eventually implemented but dragging their heels like this for popular features and then having the nerve to ask "why aren’t people flocking to us instead of Discord/WhatsApp" is such an out of touch question to ask.

              When open source developers ask for feedback from regular users and their response to said feedback is"ACKSHUALLY it’s your fault, not the application’s fault", as it often is, it’s no surprise that their software never gains traction. It’s like a guy who wears cargo pants to a formal affair and then gets into an argument over attire because in his mind, cargo pants = more pockets = superior, completely oblivious to every other factor.

              Another thing-- Signal requires your phone number, Discord doesn’t. I know right away folks are going to rage about how Discord is the real privacy nightmare, not Signal. I don’t disagree, but the average user is just going to be more wary about being forced to give up their phone number in order to use Signal, even if the software now allows them to hide it.

              • Wave@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Phone number point is stupid to bring up because most public discord servers turn on the setting that prevents you from speaking until you’ve verified a phone number, and I’d trust signal with my number over discord any day of the week. I never said general users should jump ship, I said that the reason they DONT is because other platform dont have the advertising budget, nor the user base to make users jump ship. People act like they give a shit about features but as soon as they can only talk to their friends because they all left for one platform, even if its “worse” because of the feature set, they WILL follow or be left out. Its why I originally joined Discord, I didn’t want to leave Skype but thats where everyone was going. I am now taking the other side where I refuse to use discord. I use Signal and Matrix. if people want to talk to me, they talk to me on there or not at all, and ykno what. Ive gotten 20+ people to switch.

                • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Discord doesn’t require a phone number to use it and there’s tons of servers that don’t require phone number verification. The vast majority of servers I’m in have no phone number requirement. Signal straight will not work without your phone number, in any capacity. I’m sure you’d trust Signal over Discord with your phone number any day of the week but as I said, that’s an irrelevant point because we’re talking about why people are more attracted to Discord over Signal. Slacks vs ugly cargo pants.

                  I said that the reason they DONT is because other platform dont have the advertising budget, nor the user base to make users jump ship.

                  Have you ever seen an ad for Discord? I haven’t see one before and I only know about it through word of mouth. There’s nothing stopping people from creating Signal groups for various hobbies and including a Signal link in their social media page.

                  Refusing to use Discord might be noble from a privacy/security point of view but from a broader perspective, you’re significantly limiting your social interactions and not because of the people but the app the people are using to communicate with. It’s like not using a phone at all because pretty much any phone is a privacy/security issue.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I already use a different app for voice chat, and never used Discord’s voice chat feature.

        Discord is a modern alternative to IRC, Slack, or a more fully featured version of Matrix. I never considered it for the voice chat feature.

        People always bring up voice chat alternatives, which don’t replace Discord at all, because voice chat is a tiny unimportant feature of Discord that I wouldn’t notice if they removed.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Storage (and transfer and processing) has only ever gotten cheaper, but okay.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Sure it’s getting cheaper, but is it getting cheaper faster than their need for it?

      I’ve always expected their business model was unsustainable probably only able to manage through venture capital and growth.

      There’s hardly even any competition, their free product is substantial. Even fully funding a server is barely enough to cover a bare metal node.

      This is just the introduction to cost savings. As they wade into market saturation, and still need to provide growth in numbers they’ll need to pinch the free users into paying and pinch the paying users into paying enough to fully fund the service. Of course it won’t stop there…

      Edit: FFS dictation can’t ‘their’ it’s way out of a wet paper bag.

  • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    If Discord was open source, I actually would not mind paying a fee for it. Fixed or reccurring, ideally the former. But that’s never happening. And forget buying that Nitro thing.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    I gotta admit, I have no problem with introducing a completely new feature and locking it to paying members. But taking away an already existing feature from non-members, or limiting it in some way, is simply outrageous. They could’ve kept the upload limit at 25MB, and increased it for Nitro users to something like an entire gigabyte. This would’ve encouraged people to get Nitro. But lowering the upload limit for free users would just encourage them to leave and find an alternative (and the problem is that there aren’t any viable ones because they aren’t used as much).

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      So email came before Google. Email was good. You went to your computer and downloaded your inbox. You could either delete the email from the server and have it in your computer only or keep it in both places. With android and Google, the strategy was to give you an address that you couldn’t take with you anywhere, and to let you see and accumulate emails from any device such that your data could be used for AI and you couldn’t easily retain it and still use it globally. You can come up with your own email server, just not a gmail.com address. They own you until you just start elsewhere.

    • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Exactly. And they didn’t even give the 25 MB limit to every user. Some users were always stuck at 8 MB, and others 25 MB. I’m the latter and I was blown away at the decision to cut the file size limit down to 1/3rd of what I was used to.

      https://8mb.video/

      ^ This website will compress videos down to 8 MB but the video quality ends up being awful, plus I’m not so sure how I feel about the privacy/security issues of uploading personal videos to some rando website so they can be compressed.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I REALLY hate this “rolling out” of new features. Seriously, I hate it. I remember Instagram doing it when pressing the screen during Reels playback, on some accounts it pauses, on others it simply mutes the video.

        Good riddance, Instagram.