• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    Another happy customer of YouTube premium here. I canceled Netflix, never had Spotify. The only subscription I pay, worth it. The family plan works to 5 or 6 euros per person per month.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Same. I still feel the individual is worth it for me as YouTube is the bulk of content I watch. People also tend to forget that a portion of every subscription goes to the creators that you actually watch.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yea YTP individual isn’t worth it, but the family plan is (if you can fill the slots)

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    Remember when the big selling point of cable TV was no advertising? And then it became 99% ads?

    Yeah.

    • sip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      ummm I was born ~90 and I’ve always seen commercials. don’t take it the wrong way, but when were you born???

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Before the 90s. I think the best time for cable TV was between 1982 and 88. MTV wasn’t crap. The History Channel had actual history shows and the Discovery Channel always had top notch science shows. We also had “Night Flight” on “USA’s Up All Night.” They would run back to back episodes, starting at 9pm on Saturday nights and ending around 4-5am Sunday.

        Anyone who remembers 80s cable TV should feel incredibly ripped off by what they’re showing today.

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          So, you’re actually viewing the past with rose tinted glasses here. There was never a time when basic cable was completely ad free. There was certain channels that started ad free, and some like HBO only ever showed ads for their own content, but there was always ads. TV now is very different and arguably worse, but not for that reason.

  • Living_Dead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I am displeased with premium these days. My use of premium was to remove ads and give creators a little more money. The issue today is every single video will have a sponsor spot that is an ad. So here I am paying extra to get rid of ads and the creator just made their own. Using sponsor block has become a requirement to get past the wall of ads.

  • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    revanced

    ITT: lots of unpaid youtube premium shills.

    If youtube wants me to pay for their service, they can offer a service worth paying for instead of purposefully degrading their free service into an unusable mess in an attempt to force my hand.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Preach. 1080p looks like dogsh*t now and they’ve been rolling out a premium only enhanced bitrate option. Yet another case of ruin what’s good to sell what everyone already had.

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 days ago

    I kinda got grandfathered into Youtube Music by using (and enjoying) Google Music, and since YT Premium was only like $2 more, I got it. I primarily use it for the music. The no-ads is just a bonus for me, I guess.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      I did the exact same. Google Play Music was actually a good service back in the day. I hated it when they turned it into YouTube Music. I complained about all the broken stuff, so they gave me a home speaker for free and upgraded me to YT Premium for a year. After that year I stuck with YT Premium, since it was less than $2 extra. They also fixed a lot of stuff I complained about. Not everything, but a lot of it. I think YT Music was released a bit before it was ready. Now it still has some issues, but is mostly fine.

      Usually I watch 1 or 2 YouTube videos a day and without Premium I would most definitely not. I opened a YouTube video on a computer I wasn’t signed in the other day and it started with a 2 minute unskipable ad about crypto stuff (an obvious scam). So I closed it real fast, no video is worth sitting through that. Even with Premium I still need SponsorBlock. But with that combination watching videos is actually fun.

      Still listen to YouTube Music all day at work, so that’s a good value for money for me.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, same. I installed UBlock Origin on my Firefox browser for free and gotta say that enjoying YouTube and YT Music Ad-Free is the way to do it!

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I have begun to see that YT is being hostile to adblocker users - and this worries me. I assume YT is already probing the clients to see which are circumveting the ads.

    I had an (let’s say unconventional) idea at one point: an add-on which only purpose is to show the YT ads in the background which uBO blocked. All of the blocked ads would be played (eventually) - except that the user can just ignore this happening in background and wouldn’t be actually seeing the ads. I.e. the browser would just move playing the ads into a background container not visible to the user.

  • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    The main issue with YouTube premium is the price, I can’t imagine that they’re making anywhere near $14 a month from showing me ads that I never click on. I’d love to see a breakdown, including how much is subsiding free users, how much is going to creators, and how much is going into the pockets of shareholders.

    I think like most if not all of the people I know would easily pay $5 dollars for premium

    • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      I signed up through Pakistan and got the family plan for $4 AUD a month.

      Been going for a couple of years now and no problems.

      Also the big benefit is YouTube music, so I don’t need my spottyfi account anymore either

      It’s actually great value, I never watched YouTube for entertainment before I got it, now I get to watch people do way too big deep dives on subjects I would normally find boring, but because they go too far it gets interesting

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      YouTube and creators make significantly more from premium users than ad-supported. But I’m okay with that. I’m paying for a service, that service works (mostly) great. I get essentially Spotify and ad-free YouTube for that price, and thus get far more bang for my buck than a Max subscription or a Hulu subscription or whatever.

      A lot of the features of YouTube Premium (ad-free, downloads, offline music, background play and PiP on mobile, video queues, etc.) are likely available from other YouTube clients, but given how much I use the service I don’t mind paying for it. Especially since using other clients sucks for the creators (unless you’re personally subscribing to everyone’s Patreon, and I don’t know about you but there are a few channels I subscribe to on Patreon and FAR more that I just…watch).

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Even if there was a single ad that I would want to click on, ever, I would still just simply look up the site instead. The only reason I’ve clicked an ad in the past 20 years was when I did it accidentally. They know that (as in, they know that the click ratio will be low) and I’m sure their goal is just for you to see the ad.