• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Also a result of the inevitable decline of Capitalism and Imperialism, which is what we are seeing in America, a desparate and incorrect ploy to “turn the clock back” to the “good old days.”

    It can’t be beaten electorally, it will remain until it either succeeds or Capitalism itself is escaped and we transition to Socialism.

  • greencactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fun fact: The nowadays conservative (and IMO right leaning) German CDU has originally considered capitalism to be the reason for outbreak for WW2. They wanted to form a new Christian Socialism, which would’ve united Christian ideals with a socialistic (not marxistic) economy. The so-called Kölner Erklärung was written in 1945 as a basic idea for where Germany should head from perspective of the CDU.

    These ideas didn’t last for long and got replaced by a conservative fiscal policy. But it is good to keep in mind that even in the CDU there were people who recognized that capitalism ultimately has a strong tendency to fuel fascism. In Nazi Germany, the main capitalists worked closely with the NSDAP - Krupp, Bosch, Hugo Boss (who famously designed the Nazi uniforms), Volkswagen were all lead by rich capitalists who saw (and gained) profit by the actions of the Nazis. It makes me sad that even the SPD, the so-called Social Democratic Party, long forgot what it means to fight for socialism and equality, and instead embraces neoliberalism with a touch of social politics.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It makes so much more fundamental sense for the followers of Jesus to embrace socialist values as opposed to the tendency of Christians to follow both conservative and capitalistic politics.

      I’m an atheist but I was raised Christian Catholic and the stark contrast between the religious texts and parables with the actions of the average Christian or the Church was a great contributor to my rejection of religion. I still see value in some of the teachings (be nice to others, people before material things) and always took them closer to socialism values than the Supply Side Jesus right-leaning Christians adopted.

  • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dam, i fully slept on The Boys. Thoughts its just a Watchmen ‘supers in real life’ rip off. First season on par with Breaking Bad for me

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s brilliant IMO (I haven’t seen the latest season but the one before … season 3 did feel like it was losing its way a bit).

      The thing with mainstream super hero stuff is that it seems to very much about supporting the status quo without really examining it. Generally, the MCU has been pretty guilty of this AFAICT. It’s also why Winter Soldier is probably the best MCU film IMO … Captain America becomes “the enemy” by standing up for his principles and destroys shield.

      The Boys is about examining the status quo and so stands out massively compared to all of the other mainstream superhero stuff.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s just too fucking dark for me. I don’t dislike a gritty show necessarily but I couldn’t make it through more than the first few episodes. It seemed good, but damn I have plenty of problems and shittiness in my real life, I like my entertainment to make me feel better, not worse. 😀

      • Eylrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Same. I like dark stories as much as the next person, but it hit way too close to home with real world politics for me.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Who are you?”

    “I’m you if Batman didn’t have a ring what makes you a removed ass”

        • comfy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s the point of having two similar yet distinct characters. Most people don’t look at capitalism and see fascism, they appear distinct to most, so having them both be Homelander would be a poor visual analogy.

          • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            To me, an ignorant person who has only begun to seriously question capitalism after being exposed to lemmy for about a year, this visual analogy seems to imply that capitalism and fascism are thought to be distinct in the eyes of the maker of this meme, though. I think the suggestion of having them both be homelander conveys a different message which seems to be the consensus here: they are different sides of the same coin.

            Admittedly, I’m out of my element here but I’m enjoying the exposure.

            • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              No you nailed it. The meme is a poor metaphor because it implies that the system has ever been superman or that OP believes it to have been superman.

              Or that capitalism only behaves like Homelander when times are tough.

              For many people Capitalism has always treated them like Homelander. For many people they’ve never seen the Superman fascade.

              So this meme reads as though the creator only recently learned some world history, or has some privilege in life but is becoming aware of reality for others.

              You could also fix it by just having Homelander say “I’m you!”

  • Maiznieks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Russia has had a tough ride since 90ties of the last century which is pretty much explained by this.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it’s more that strong men leaders get backers when the majority want them. All kinds of leaders are out there at all times, people swap their support to whichever they feel like at any given time. So when times get tough, half the population will side with power concentration, primitive but simple leadership structures. The other half want power decentralized and consensus to be required, the agreement of the majority, not be left with obedience to authority, which eliminates the ability for consensus or agreement. Nobodies needs matter except the needs at the top.

      It’s actually probably absolutely necessary that the GOP see Trump as sharing their interests. If you had to give up your power, you’d want to give it to whoever shares the most do your interests, so their exercise of power is more likely to benefit you. You wouldn’t willingly give to to someone whose interests were furthest from yours. And what an irony that Trump has convinced them their interests align. If we could break that assumption, people would find it much harder to hand over their power. But since Trump literally doesn’t care if he collapses America, he’s willing to give them things they want, regardless of the wisdom of it.

      God the GOP are the fucking worst.

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Surely it was a tough pick between using Superman or Captain America in the top panel.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    One’s an economic school of thought, the other a political one, so obviously you can have both at the same time or even working together. Coincidentally corporate business is mostly anti-fascist right now because social diversity and progressiveness is where the money’s at

    I can only guess you’ve used one of the words out of context. If it was fascism, I have nfi what the meme is trying to say by linking Superman to capitalism in the same way Homelander is easily linked with fascism.

    If the joke instead about fascism, then maybe something positive and relatable to it would make sense. Patriotism is what I think of since Superman loves America, but shows little concern for anyone else and this sentiment could start festering domestically, especially if the love for country becomes ultra-nationalistic.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No, you stupid western swine. That’s just westoid propaganda!

      However I, too, wasn’t aware China’s historic fascism problem was the result of capitalistic woes.

      Everyday i learn new facts from .ml, like China invented capitalism (take THAT, Sumer!!1).

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Capitalism is a form of economic organization, fascism is a form of government (or just a form of social control), antithetical to democracy or socialism.

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      yeah its totally just a crazy coincidence that fascism only arises in capitalist countries and that it does so when capitalism is facing a crisis, Im sure that the fact that the word privatization was coined to describe nazi economics is also just a coincidence, and certainly pinochet making all his economic policy based on the recommendation of the Chicago school of economics is also just a coincidence. The nazis giving medals to renowned pile of sub-human garbage and of course capitalist hero henry ford most also be just a coincidence. At every turn the fascists make it clear that they are capitalist and yet libs are so fucking deluded that they cant even recognize their own allies in the maintenance of capitalism.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can’t separate economic structures from State structures. Fascism is specifically a far-right entrenchment of Capitalism as a response to Capitalist decay.

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think a big issue is that people call things that are not capitlatist “capitalist”. The US is called capitalist, but it has the largest government in the history of the world, that is not capitalism.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Capitalism cannot exist without a government. Capitalism reaching the stage where large Capitalists wield the State both domestically and internationally to fuel their profits does not make it no longer Capitalist, that’s like saying a tree isn’t a plant because it is no longer a seed.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please read Wealth of Nations, and A Theory of Moral Sentiments. Adam Smith clearly laid out what capitalism is, and you have no clue what that word means.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Cool, what part did I miss? Also Adam Smith died hundreds of years ago, so I am not sure why he would be the go to for this.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes exactly, those lobbyists exist because there is a huge amount of power to take so they can control us.