cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10882099
Thankfully I don’t use any of their products, but this really pisses me off. They claim that this open source project “causes significant economic harm to their company”
This is ridiculous. It is truly ridiculous. How can something that enables the user to efficiently control their AC cause “significant economic harm”???
Consider forking the repository or mirroring it to another platform like GitLab, Codeberg or your self-hosted Git server, so the project can continue to exist and someone can maybe fork it and maintain it.
The effected repos are: https://github.com/Andre0512/hOn and https://github.com/Andre0512/pyhOn
If you don’t know about Home Assistant, check it out. It’s an amazing piece of open-source software, that you can run at home on your own server and use it to control your smart home devices. That way, you don’t need to connect them to the manufacturer’s (probably insecure) cloud. It gives you sovereignty over your smart home instead of some proprietary vendor-locked garbage. Check out their website and the Lemmy community: !homeassistant@lemmy.world
I also highly recommend Louis Rossmann’s video about this: https://youtu.be/RcSnd3cyti0
He makes awesome videos in general, consider subscribing.
As Rossmann said, don’t ever buy anything from such a shitty company that doesn’t respect their customers. This move by Haier is nothing other than a slap in the face for everyone, who just wants to comfortably control the product they paid for. This company is actively hostile towards their paying customers. Fuck these bastards!
significant economic harm to our company
Oh! I have a solution! Make it a local API you fucking goofs.
My manager once asked me if I could code in API
Nah, I’d rather data get sent out to external servers and then come back. This is efficient and very smart.
When companies build shitty software for which they charge arms and legs extra and are pissed that someone found their way around it
Translation: our legal team has to justify their employment, thus we’re threatening non-profit open source projects that can’t fight back and pose no harm whatsoever to the company’s financials, market position, customers, or any other stakeholder.
It’d be awesome if the maintainers could get a pro bono advice / representation here to make a proper response. They’re volunteering their free time improving an extensive list of crappy products of a brand and this is what they get back? Disgusting move from Haier.
I always thought about why don’t FOSS projects that are at risk of getting sued by big corp like (NewPipe, Popcorn Time, streamio, tachiyomi …) embrace the dark web or git over torrent via VPN, so their projects don’t get threatened with take downs. z-library ended having to move to the dark web after all.
Most ppl don’t think about that or don’t know that their project will take off. And then it is already too late.
- Give the copyright to the FSF
- Donate to the FSF
why donate it? theyll just be sued? do they have powerful legal teams?
The FSF actively encourages people to do that, and yes their legal team is there. Not sure whether it’s “powerful” but surely better than a single developer
How do you “give copyright” to them?
Wouldn’t be a bad idea for potential customers to write Haier and let them know they’re on a personal blacklist.
Is there an OSS-hostile list, like the opposite of the Awesome-XYZ lists?
How is the plugin illegal?
It’s not like a judge said it’s illegal… what happened is that a huge multinational company sent a menacing letter to a developer regarding their hobby project, and the developer —understandably— decided to comply.
Ask those brain dead fucks at Haier
It sounds like someone out of their jurisdiction should host the repos and tell them to pound sand.
Codeberg is hosted in Germany
Pretty sure the maintainer is in Germany so that wouldn’t help (unless you meant something else by your comment)
How many GBs do these ACs upload to the company’s cloud?
That ended up being a router error. It was actually something like 1mb.
Too many probably
Another one to the boycott list
