• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    FF is doing great. All the have to do now is the Steam strategy. Do nothing and wait for the competition to fuck themselves over.

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      You mean hope that they too don’t become subject to enshittification? I don’t have a lot of faith in that.

      Besides that, Google is controlling as fuck. They might keep fucking themselves over but there’s no way they won’t start attempting to ruin things for the rest of us.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Steam’s strategy was to be first to market and essentially the only player in the game for a decade, making themselves the default.

  • HKPiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I love Firefox, but I can’t shake the feeling that it is slower on YouTube. My tinfoil hat theory is that Google somehow throttles YouTube on Firefox.

    • cowfodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure someone discovered that is true recently, but can’t be assed to try to find it right now.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same happens with Safari. The page loads in a weird funky way, video sorta first and then comments and suggestions many seconds later.

      On Chrome on the exact same computer it’s instant.

      They’re doing it on purpose.

    • Promethiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You haven’t experienced slow until you try to take Firefox through Google Cloud Console or Search Tools. 15 seconds in Chrome, somehow turns into 3 minutes in Firefox, funny how it does that.

    • adventor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Do you use YouTube so much that a small performance difference on a single Site has an influence on your browser choice?

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      For YouTube on IOS, I use Brave. It does a decent (but not perfect) job of hiding ads on YT.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Google somehow throttles YouTube on Firefox.

      Because they do. A while back, it was discovered they were injecting delays if they detected Firefox as your user agent.

    • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ironically I use a chrome type browser for YouTube and mail checking only. This is also the only browser in which I am logged in with my Google account.

      My main Firefox is for everything else including search.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    People saying FF is slower: like how much slower? are we taking like 14 millisecond slower? Cause everything seems pretty instantaneous here. Maybe its because i’m old enough to remember DSL and 56k internet, but I think FF os crazy fast and even if Chrome would be 25% faster I wouldn’t switch to evil google for that.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      61 Firefox windows and 427 tabs (don’t judge, I know I have a problem) and I have no performance complaints - admittedly, not all of them are active/rendering simultaniously, but still…

      Firefox (and its forks) have been my go-to for 15 years.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          indeed! had I not posted this, I would be asking the same question!

          so, its quite a bit more mundane than you might have hoped for.

          a mix of…

          • ~40% locally served internal pages (mostly zabbix, mail/web server monitoring, some development pages, etc).
          • ~60% non-local pages - currently lots of retro computing stuff, debian stuff, github (sigh)

          the most recent page I opened was an archive.org page on TI-84 firmware disassembly.

          I make heavy use of Firefox containers for separation. honestly, Firefox is an absolute workhorse for me. if the Firefox ecosystem were to fall into the void, I would be dead in the water.

          • smowtenshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s a really interesting set of pages!

            I remember opening hundreds of random github repos and starring them for “further research”, and never looking at them again.

            Also yes, life without Firefox would be miserable.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Chrome-109-Benchmarks

      I wish firefox was faster but benchmarks are pretty common, it’s not hard to test. It’s kind of an unfair fight at this point honestly, large swaths of the web are just built for chrome. There are other benchmark options out there, but even using Mozilla’s own kraken benchmarking solution, it loses tremendously more than it wins. I honestly really respect them for not building their benchmarking system to make their solutions come out on top.

      In some benchmarks the lag from firefox is very significant and then on the other hand, when firefox does win, chrome is usually right behind it. It’s not ideal.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s clear, slower is relative. FF is slower in the startup and rendering some heavy loading webs, but the difference certainly isn’t sooo dramatic. It’s not a reason to avoid it, the only reason depends of the use of a browser, if it fits your needs or not.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    chrome used to be good. Emphasis on the past tense.

    Firefox was always good. Chrome was very briefly better. Firefox has not suffered enshittification like chrome did.

    • Dr. Zoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      This. Firefox has always been just good. It wasn’t great or anything, it was just a good browser. Then chrome came around and it had more, better features. It was a bit more memory usage, but those were for the additional features Firefox didn’t have.

      Firefox didn’t really change a whole lot, it added synching features across accounts, and didn’t get worse. It just stayed the same.

      The people made Firefox better, because now they’re creating add-ons for Firefox, where chrome had more.

      I feel like once chrome got the majority of browser users, it immediately started going to shit. I have no proof of this, just a memory of it being better until it was announced that chrome was the most used browser, and the near immediate heavier memory usage.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, I clearly remember firefox being terrible back when Chrome was just beginning to take off.

      It was a lumbering monolith that ate all your ram and loaded pages at a glacial pace. Chrome was a multi-process revolution from that.

      Then, firefox got it’s shit together and chrome got overloaded with corpo bullshit.

      • KrankyKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It used to take firefox ages to open. I switched back after the big update in the mid 2010s that made it good again.

    • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      firefox is going on a steady decline more recently with ads on the homepage by default, plus new telemetry being introduced. hopefully it can change direction

  • MewtwoLikesMemes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, I’m less worried about the speed and moreso I just don’t like supporting Google’s de facto monopoly of the Web’s infrastructure.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Firefox is slower, not because it’s worse, but Gecko is a minority engine in the web (~3-4%) and because of this the most webs are optimized for Blink. That is the only reason and because most current Browsers are using it, a devils circle. The result of leaving Google hands-free for too long and that for 20 years the number of available engines has remained stagnant (3 and some testimonial exotic forks) because it is the most complicated part of a browser. Little can be done now.

    Well, Apples WebKit is even worse than Gecko, as a small consolation for FF users.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re switching a couple extensions are uBlock origin and no script with Firefox, prevents most ads and lets you choose which hosts to accept JavaScript from temporarily or permanently.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      noscript is your web condom. I will not touch a page without it.

        • uhN0id@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Would noscript allow you to block things like when a site packs your history with their website making it impossible to back out to the page you came from? How does it work considering so many sites now are built with JavaScript libraries like React?

          • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I dunno about the history but single page apps like react apps you can just accept the JS from the actual host in the address bar and leave all the rest turned off. Just tested on twitch. Accepting no JS loaded the home page and a spinner gif after selecting a stream. Accepted just twitch.tv and I could see the video stream and chat without having to accept any of the other hosts blocked.

            • uhN0id@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Rad. Thank you. Working on my switch to Firefox today. Between this noscript stuff and learning about styling Firefox with CSS I’m absolutely sold on the switch and no longer dread the process of ditching Chrome (mostly due to familiarity than anything else).

              Thanks for the info!

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Vivaldi has in its inbuild ad/trackerblocker also filters to block cookie popups, no problem with this

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mouse gestures is the killer-app for me on Firefox. Hate surfing without it.

      P.S. Do wish Firefox had tab groups tho.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m gonna be honest.

    The main reason I don’t like Firefox is the ui.

    It’s one of those things where I’ve been using chrome for so long that switching to anything else is infuriating. Trying to learn the layout and all the features. Trying to figure out how to do things that are intuitively design on Google.

    If someone made pretty much a 1 to 1 copy of Google without all the bullshit I’d use it in a heartbeat.

    • mub@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have the same problem the other way around. When I use chrome it feels like I’m using a kids browser. Slightly cutesy with too many curvy bits. Sort of like the difference between Duplo (chrome) and Lego (Firefox). Basically the same thing, but also not.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        UI in Vivaldi is unique, you can set it to simple as an old IE or to an dashboard of an Spaceshuttle and everything in between in the settings and more with CSS. Also using of more than 4000 themes, or made and share your own. You can install Chrome extensions, but most are redundant because of the own inbuild ones, or even install directly userscripts as extensions.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is certainly a hurdle to overcome. Google helped by changing the Chrome UI for the worse in some ways I care about, but migrating to a new browser and getting used to different UI is enough of a hassle that I’m still holding out until adblock actually stops working before I make the switch.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have been on the firefox train since it was new. I witnessed the rise of Chrome and Chromium, and never really felt the pull, and worried about everyone targeting the same platform. Figured I’d stay on FF until I had no choice. Don’t see myself leaving.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Figured I’d stay on FF until I had no choice. Don’t see myself leaving.

      i’m in a similar boat and given the overwhelming majority popular use of chrome, it feels clear to me that firefox will eventually stop working and i wonder what surfing will like like for me in the future.

      i suspect i’ll have to go back to use chrome again.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve switched to Firefox but there’s definitely a few things that irritate me about it.

    First thing is when I boot up my computer, launch Firefox, it launches long enough for me to click a bookmark then closes to perform an update. And then doesn’t automatically reopen…

    I also have it set to not “remember” my tabs after closing. Yet when I launch Firefox for the first time after rebooting or closing ally tabs, it gives me a “hmm… we’re having a hard time finding your previous session” message. Uh, yeah, I told you not to look for it… can I just have the regular “new tab” page?

    It also might just be because I’m used to chrome, but I feel the mobile app is severely lacking. I hate that I can’t access my bookmarks directly from the new tab page, and that the tablet version doesn’t show you your bookmark bar. The synchronization between mobile and desktop isn’t great either, I’ll have a very long specific search query that I’ve used multiple times on my phone, yet it doesn’t offer it for auto-complete on desktop, I have to search the entire term again or go digging through my history. When you’re searching long model numbers and the like, this is incredibly frustrating.

    Finally, and I don’t know if this is a Firefox issue, but there’s some memory leak that occurs when viewing a webcam stream from my raspberry pi that only has happened in Firefox. The first time I noticed it happening my PC slowed to a crawl, when task manager finally opened Firefox was taking 23GB of RAM. So I have to use chrome to keep that steam open for more than a few minutes at a time.

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Everything enshitifies… Everything, problem that worries me that, Firefox will enshitify like this too one day

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      At that point it will be forked yet again, and that fork will take over. Mozilla is a very active open source member though.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mozilla has no traditional profit motive. The Mozilla Corporation, which develops Firefox, is a 100% subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, which is legally a non-profit organisation.

      So, if the Mozilla Corporation makes a profit, they cannot pay out that profit to shareholders. Practically all they can do with that money, is to pay higher wages or set it aside for future invest in their products.

      That does not mean that they cannot stagnate or use money badly. And it does not either mean that they never need to make money. But it does mean that there’s no shareholders demanding short-term profit above all else.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          How close did we come to being a footnote in the history of a future species that would happen upon our ruins ten thousand years from now? Would they indulge in the fiction of their own immortality until the Shivans came for them? And how long had this gone on? Did the Ancients stumble upon the monoliths and the tombs of their predecessors in this distant corner of space, dismissing the warnings carved into the walls of the sepulchre? And when the destroyers came at last, what did the Ancients think as they sifted the cremation of dust and bones, staring into the mute remains for a key; some solution to their plight?

          What if there had been countless races stretching back into infinity? And like the nine cities of Troy each civilization had been built on the rubble of one that came before. Each annihilated by the Shivans.

          The Ancients died eight thousand years ago, as humanity emerged from its neolithic infancy. They believed their voyage across the sea of stars awoke the dragon that slept beneath the waves. That the Shivans were birthed from the flux of subspace and their destruction was the revenge of an angry cosmos.

          • bruhduh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            How close did we come to being a footnote in the history of a future corporations that would happen upon our ruins ten years from now? Would they indulge in the fiction of their own immortality until the shareholders came for them? And how long had this gone on? Did the Ancients stumble upon the monoliths and the tombs of their predecessors in this distant corner of economy, dismissing the warnings carved into the walls of the sepulchre? And when the MBAs came at last, what did the Ancients think as they sifted the cremation of infrastructure, staring into the mute remains for a key; some solution to their plight?

            What if there had been countless corporations stretching back into infinity? And like the nine cities of Troy each civilization had been built on the rubble of one that came before. Each annihilated by the shareholders.

            The Ancients died many years ago, as humanity emerged from its naivety. They believed their voyage across the sea of capitalism awoke the dragon that slept beneath the waves. That the shareholders were birthed from the flux of money and their destruction was the revenge of an trickle down economy.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I never really cared that a browser could load a page in 1.5 seconds instead of 1.9… I mean who cares?

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I usualy love it, but for some reason Firefox fails to retrieve web pages about 75% of the time when on the internet connection at my parent’s house, and I don’t know why.

    It acts like a DNS failure, but the DNS settings are the same in Firefox, Chrome, and the router.

    Meanwhile Chrome and Edge work great.

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d like to try out ff but I’d have to use it for a few days. Is it possible to possible to sync passwords and bookmarks with my Google account like chrome? How’s the touchscreen support?

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not with your Google account directly. You create a Firefox account that is client-side encrypted, and you’ll probably use your Gmail for that. Then, you can import your bookmarks/passwords from there. This might be a good time to move your passwords to an actual password manager like Bitwarden.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Afaik, all modern browsers can import/export passwords and bookmarks? FF lets you set up an account and sync across devices with a unique PW if you want (not your computer user PW, but it could be).

      No idea on touchscreens outside the Android app.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Firefox mobile isn’t there yet. Passwords will conveniently autofill from your Google account thanks to the Android level implementation of password management, but more importantly it’s resource heavy and bad UI design. Ublock support is nice but some websites just don’t deal with it well. The nightly builds do fix my main problems with the UI but they crash all the time. So there’s hope for the future, but for now it’s not great unless you absolutely need proper browser level ad blocking rather than Blokada.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tbh I switched to Firefox mobile from Chrome and have the opposite experience. While it is in someway less convenient for auto fill, as long as my Google account is logged in on another browser page I can always use it for that and they have password and credit card auto fill features should you want to take care of them.