• refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    They could add some kind of message that warns about this, but I think it’s a better idea to encrypt by default (warning or not) rather than not… at least for privacy reasons.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I consider that a separate issue.

        IMO OS vendors pushing for full disk encryption is light years better than simply shrugging and saying “well people might be dumb so we shouldn’t do it at all”.

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe educating people about backups (in general) is a better approach than being averse to increasing security/privacy.

            I still prefer MS pushing updates to people that never update vs the alternative of them getting viruses and such all the time. I just wish there was an easier way for advanced users to turn it off permanently, but it’s still not impossible so I still prefer this to people not updating at all.

              • refalo@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                All we can do is try. If we warned them and they still don’t do it, well you just can’t fix stupid and it’s not our problem anymore, plus they have bigger issues if they can’t read. That’s still better than doing nothing. And still better than not having device encryption IMO.