Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

  • Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m fighting the good fight by using Safari to browse and Kagi to search. I have effectively eliminated Google from my life and I could not be happier about it.

    Signed, a former Google fan who got tired of being the product for their ever shittier services.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Apple and Google deserve about the same amount of trust. I don’t know that Safari is any better than Chrome other than keeping a large portion of users in a secondary browser. I guess it all depends on whether uBlock Origin is able to be loaded on it along with other useful extensions. I’m a Firefox fan though.

      • emptyfish@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wouldn’t nominate either one for sainthood, no argument there. I walked away from Google because they are an ad company that makes devices and software - that has become increasingly more apparent in the last several years, I’m sure it was always true but less obvious in the early days.

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Apple has their own set of issues for sure, but I don’t think they’re comparable to the spyware advertising conglomerate that is Google.