Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    but when you tell the moz fanboys why moz sucks you’ll find yourself in a meta/maga like echochamber. again and again moz made absolute shit decisions, the managing board is eating money like mad and google is STILL your default search engine. pathetic.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What I don’t get is why hasn’t there been a split yet. Not like Seamonkey, but from major developers of FF.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      youre mad that firefox gets funded by google and all they have to do is change one setting thats easily changeable by the user on install?

      if you are that mad… then donate to mozilla.