Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

  • @Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    Is Firefox considered bad? It works well for me and when I use Chrome or edge It feels full of junk features

    • @treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      Firefox has been nice to work with on my end. And fast. Even the dev tools are way better than they were a decade ago. Almost all the important extensions work on it.

      I don’t really understand how its market share is so low now.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      It works for me, as well as family members who aren’t as technical / don’t care about why I picked Firefox

    • @ConstableJelly@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      I don’t think so. The article claims Firefox lost some of its lead developers to Google when it started developing Chrome and then took a long time to regain its footing around 2017. That sounds about right to my recollection. I had admittedly switched to Chrome myself for a while (I’m not terribly tech-savvy, maybe a little more than average) but switched back to Firefox last year. I am still pretty deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem though in other ways.