

What a nonsensical point.
Since you like links;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
“form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that following the logic of a contrary proposition or argument would lead to absurdity”
I need to add
You are setting up a false equivalence. There is a vast difference between a baseless, unprovable fantasy (like alien clones) and evaluating a public figure’s actions based on a well-documented history of psychological projection.
When someone constantly accuses their opponents of staging events and has a documented history of projection, it creates a lack of trust. The reason people question the narrative is because of that history, not because they are entertaining fantasies about the Matrix or alien clones. Equating a discussion about someone’s known behavioral patterns to science fiction doesn’t address the core issue of trust.


Weird way to admit they’re using AI, but OK.