who cares

when you lie down with dogs…

I don’t even think the toadies paid to write up these plans take it seriously. Radical industrial policy shifts take a little longer than 4.5 years to plan, pay for, and execute.

Seems clear to me that the US knows NATO is doomed and is just trying to get the EU to soak up as much of the blame as possible for when it happens. 2027 isn’t even two whole years from now. They aren’t dumb enough to think Europe is suddenly going to shit out a fully functional war economy in like a year and a half, especially when they themselves put their official rearmament timeline at around 2030. They’re setting them up for failure.
I really thought that NATO would limp on until like 2040 but at this rate… will they even last to the end of the decade??

They didn’t omit it. It’s in the body of the article, just not the headline.

You could argue that it isn’t talked about enough and they buried the lede and I’d be inclined to agree but idk, this article isn’t about climate change it’s about potential trade routes 🤷‍♂

tf kind of doublespeak is “winning the peace”. Is that the same thing as a Moral Victory? Just give these assholes a participation trophy and tell them to move on already.

Damn at this rate it seems like Z’s administration will be finished by New Year’s.

you forgot “le biggest land invasion since WW2!1!”

if you find out let me know

i don’t think wanting to do damage control is specific to culture…that just sounds like a human thing

“I’m not chauvinistic!” proceeds to throw out another auto-removed insult

I already wasn’t really taking you seriously but saying chauvinistic shit like “stop scaring the hoes away” and then in the same breath trying to lecture us on how to communicate with people without being insulting was the cherry on top lol. good luck trying to trick libs into being socialists. It’s never worked historically but I’m sure it will this time.

it’s kinda sad how hot of a take it is to so many people.