• 0 Posts
  • 74 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2020

help-circle










  • honestly surprised to see so many downvotes.

    I’ve been trying to compact my writing lately, and perhaps failed to communicate clearly. because i really felt like i’d already pre-agreed with everything you wrote when i said

    society currently seems to project an emotionally stunted image onto the male identity. but it’s important to note this is a sickness in current society rather than anything inherently “male”.

    obviously i didn’t communicate properly, because imo that’s in perfect agreement with what you said here

    how we’re socialised to handle our feelings also plays a big role

    this is what i meant about society projecting an ‘incomplete’ image onto the male identity. i want to stress here, this isn’t a statement about any man, or even men as a group. imo it has nothing to do with “maleness” and everything to do with an impossibly hamstrung identity being thrust onto people. by impossible i mean it’s literally impossible for any human to exist as an emotional shadow like that. no human can do it & we’re expecting 50% of the population to magically achieve it. whatcouldgowrong.jpg

    i’ve spent quite some time trying to work out exactly where it comes from, i’m still not sure but i feel like a big dose of victorian era repression sure didn’t help, plus perhaps alot of unprocessed trauma from the men who went to WW1 and experienced an entirely unprecedented form of PTSD en masse (what at the time was called shellshock) those men who came home brought it into their families and became our fathers fathers fathers etc etc. it’s definitely intergenerational imo.

    i also think as society progresses technologically, there is less need for ‘male brute force’ to ‘provide’, so it will naturally create a bit of a vacuum in the perceived “male role”. i can easily imagine an alternate history where something positive and strong had filled this vacuum instead of the poisoned version we got.

    i personally deeply do not believe it is something inherent in men, and i think this is supported by the stats you raise which shows a disparity in the distribution vs world average.

    rather i very much see this as a deep flaw in our current society, men are emotionally hamstrung and have dangerously impossible emotional expectations placed on them (again, this isn’t the fault of any one gender or group, it is society at large to blame here). (and of course equally insane but different expectations are thrust onto all genders)

    a huge part of the problem imo is when boys are taught not to cry - actually wait, it’s even worse, they’re taught “boys don’t cry”, this is an unbelievable absurdity. crying is natural, normal & healthy. not only denying boys & men this natural emotional outlet, but tangling it up with the idea that “boys don’t do it” therefore if one does, some part of their supposed identity is under threat. it’s quite simply unbelievably toxic, it’s literally poison. and. it. hurts. everyone.

    but that’s fundamentally why i think calling it ‘The male loneliness epidemic’ is hurtful to everyone. alongside all the usual ragebait hooks, there’s the sleight of hand of reducing a monumental issue to a fragment of the actual scale of the problem.


  • Short Answer

    imo the rise of loneliness effects both women & men about equally in terms of scope.

    the push to strongly gender the ‘epidemic’ one way or the other is classic ragebait.

    Longer Answer

    Yes society currently seems to project an emotionally stunted image onto the male identity. but it’s important to note this is a sickness in current society rather than anything inherently “male”.

    and it’s causing alot more suffering for all genders than just ‘loneliness’. calling it The male loneliness epidemic is just loaded with so many hooks, it’s just classic bait.

    men vs women is “powerful” for ragebait because it’s literally half the population vs the other half.




  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoScience@lemmy.mlOpen journal questions?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    without further context, i’m not sure you could read much into a single act of downloading

    it could be as simple as it contained some keywords for a lit review someone was doing

    from there they might eliminate it from their review, choose to cite it favourably, or choose to criticise it.

    if the journal has a good reputation, being a comparatively frequently read (downloaded) paper from a periodical could be considered a positive reception.





  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlSelective rage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    it’s even worse than that cos the original text never said ariel’s human version race, they just assumed it lol.

    and before anyone says yes but its written by a dane, my response is yes but it’s a fairy tale, anything is possible. why assume and then get angry based on your assumption?