Hah, stochastic parrots.
Makes me wonder. Every laziness I’ve had with the vector guessers, I’ve seen an exact counterweight.
matrix scrombulator | webpage (2007-2014) |
---|---|
Here’s random code. Pray it works | Free ancient code at man 3 getifaddrs . |
How does this API work? (when the API has below 10 million sample lines of code) | Incredibly concise documentation worth spending 2 minutes on or HTML text without margin lines worth spending 20 minutes on |
Maybe this is what’s causing your bug. Investigate a, b, and c. Conclusion sentence. | footnote in ArchWiki / archetypal 2009 StackOverflow duplicate |
Here’s the main idea of X… you need to take into account a combination of facets to ensure safety. | Angry blog post about X that’s oddly technical (now you see both sides) |
One, you can invoke more often (throw ChatGPT configs against the wall until it doesn’t error); the other you can invoke more deeply. So I can’t help but wonder – when we cancel out all the terms – if the timesaving sum is positive or negative. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Round two, hell yeah.
The aesthetica of a stack of notes, born from a “dead end”, is secretly an odd motivator. You look back and see
and then beyond you, the effort lays itself out in a pretty trusswork.
_or_maybe_i_just_think_well-used_notebooks_are_pretty