The population under scrutiny is oblivious to the existence of the science of Psychohistory. The time periods dealt with are in the region of 3 generations. The population must be in the billions (±75 billions) for a statistical probability to have a psychohistorical validity.

Just keep refreshing. This number is live.

2 lines of different sizes

This one has charm, but the trend is strange.

Where are the ‘?’ marks. Is this how people write now.

Temporarily Unhoused Spiders

Wait. They eat mosquitos?

How do I attract more of these flying dragons?

This is what happens when we let AI read the internet.

Stole it he did! He tricks me into looking at another model, and the minute I has me back turned, he makes off with me favorite ‘at!

Well I… never thought of it as a lure before. Huh.

They also duke it out if two crabs want the same shell. I recall one video where two crabs were goin round the outside when a third one just moves into the shell. Hilarious at scale, but I bet the first two were pissed. Good thing they weren’t pistol shrimp.

I just realized oily feathers probably explain why penguins rocket through / out of the water so well. Non-mixing liquids and all that. I think I’m on to something.

You boop, I’ll watch.

But why not put the labels at the bottom of the chart?

Probable approximate correctness only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Hmm. How about an event horizon tat? Any interest?

Pfft, I got it the first time.

The “math” is repeated with horizontal symmetry too; these explanations are the same.

A growing star.

I think it’s because it helps them manipulate objects, just like fingers on a hand.

Step 3. Ensure you don’t leave any evidence as you tie the body.