Not OP but

https://ourworldindata.org/nuclear-energy

Indeed. But seriously, how does passing on leadership to their child for two generations in a row not give cause to super grave concern for all socialists?

One can be socialist and critical of dynastic states

That would make those black holes the dark matter.

Also why don’t they evaporate like other small black holes? Sorry I can’t watch your video right now.

I think with Outer Wilds and Obra Dinn I realized that “Information games” are just my absolute favourite genre of games. Portal is incredible, but more a regular puzzle game than an information game.

Every game I play is like “this is good, but it’s no Outer Wilds…”

The meter doesn’t work :(

I agree.

But the working class struggle that the comment mentioned is of course bigger than the genocide. Since they mentioned it, I wanted to learn more about their position. Discussing socialism and unionisation in the context of the class struggle does not diminish the genocide in Palestine.

I’m still not sure I follow what group counts as liberal on different parts of Lemmy, but does liberal to you include e.g. democratic socialists? Social democrats? Non-revolutionary socialist orgs?

Or are liberals free-market small-state types?

It was not at all meant as a gotcha. Let me reformulate: “Which issues in particular are you referring to? The class struggle leads to a plethora of important societal issues to address, and I am interested in hearing some particular examples. One such example could be the issue of unionisation, which holds a great deal of nuance across political contexts around the world, and therefore is a particularly interesting microcosm of this topic.”

If I had known that my question would be understood as hostile, I would certainly have put in more time to clarify what I meant. I’m still not sure why my question is hostile?

Can we not discuss like adults?

As in whether it should be owned by the workers, or whether it can be seized through non-violent means?

Fuck Zionists, but surely it’s bigger than that.

Issues like what? Unionisation?

Here’s a secondary source: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-the-intriguing-tale-of-the-gay-sheep-430683.html

No. But I know true love, so I’d say you’re wrong.

Interesting framing. But without measurements there isn’t really a need for different interpretations, is there? If that’s what you mean by “in the middle of an experiment”.

I will happily agree that before measurement, it’s very useful to think of the system as existing in many states at the same time.

I don’t know, Many Worlds always led to more confusion than Copenhagen for me. But I suppose that’s a matter of taste since they’re equivalent.

As per the relationship between measurement and entanglement, from an empiricist viewpoint all quantum mechanical terms are related to measurement. If entanglement didn’t affect the outcome of measurements, it wouldn’t exist.

Indeed, you can disentangle an entangled system, which of course will change the outcome of measurements - that’s how you know it’s been disentangled.

Copenhagen interpretation doesn’t break down for quantum erasure. Upon measurement you collapse the total quantum state into a result where the two measurements are consistent, that’s simply what entanglement means.

The timing of experiments, and the choice of what to measure, are elements ultimately irrelevant to the above statement, as the quantum erasure experiment demonstrates.

Unlike the Copenhagen interpretation, it does not privilege measurement over other types of interactions between systems.

Hmm, you could say it instead privileges the subjective experience over other types of interaction. There’s no reason in principle why you couldn’t experience every “world” at the same time, in the same way a measurement could in principle return all possible results at the same time.

But you don’t. Somehow your experience of reality is above unitary time evolution, even though “you” aren’t.