They should train them to bring down a little can on a string so you can talk to them 😂

How much do you wanna bet Trump wouldn’t be so gung ho on Greenland if he saw this map? He probably thinks he is going to double the size of America.

All Europe has to do is strong him along with promises for three years (hopefully)

Wholly run on sentence batman.

That entire first “paragraph” is a single sentence…

Who the fuck doesn’t have at least that much tariffs already?

Well not as an individual but the owners/caretakers of the land are legally required to remove it and remediate the area.

Depends on the rules. Some places it would be illegal to disturb anything in conservation areas like parks but other areas it would be illegal to ignore invasive plants and not remove them.

PNW… Himalayan Blackberry

I feel like any paper that’s published that cited a paper which got retracted, should automatically be reviewed and assessed to determine if they should also be retracted.

The article I read which had this photo featured stated that Putin had invited a bunch of reporters to Kupiansk to see how the Russian forces had surrounded the city.

Then Zelensky went there and took this photo to be like “oh no, Russia has this place surrounded? I would have never known”

No Idea if that’s true, but that’s the gist I took away from that post.

All I know is that if I were in constant pain and shitting myself because I had no more bowel control and had no ability or freedom to move myself anymore, and I could no longer do anything I enjoyed like hobbies and I was confined to sleeping 95% of the day away…

I would put myself down.

Russia was for? They are literally trying to take over another country at the moment.

… As if Trump isn’t the flakiest of flakes?

But also accessible abortion

The prestige of a journal is ranked based on how often it gets cited (or in other words, how influential the papers are within the journal).

Wouldn’t this mean that other smaller journals could still publish the random common boring studies and then pretty much everyone would be citing those, since the boring stuff like “Trees consume carbon dioxide” would be cited a lot more than specific stuff like “Molecule XX₂ can affect the brain development of Augustus caesarius if introduced between the ages of 3 and 6 months” and than become super prestigious?

I can see why journals would not want to publish boring papers in the days of paper magazines and limited space but why would they not be published digitally nowadays? Limited by people able to review them?

Gnortsmr Alien

I wonder what would happen if we transplanted some penguins from Antarctica to the arctic. Would they survive?

Maybe some of the more endangered ones could live and thrive up there, and then become a second food source for the polar bears so they don’t starve now that there isn’t as much ice to hunt seals on.

It’s not like there much of an ecosystem up there that an invasive species can fuck up like the toads down in Australia.

Devil’s advocate, is she trying to say compared to those unvaccinated but still exposed to/have had the virus? Or people who were never exposed? Because that could maybe change the context. You would think antibodies from a vaccine would stay around the same length of time as those exposed to the live virus directly.

If she is talking about people never exposed than I have no idea what she is talking about.

What we really need is to get rid of spines and thorns in blackberry bushes.