I like the concept. I don’t know how it would work in practice.

I think it would ultimately end up fragmented, especially when funding gets involved.

Who makes the decision for what gets funded? What is that decision process?

I think there will be space for a community funded news non-profit, but also I think NPR is already primed to fill that void.

I think an aggregated approach is more “Fediverse” like. But once again, who decides what does/doesn’t get published?

I think if those decisions and how they’re made are transparent, that would increase credibility, but it would end up being silo’ed because people like to read/watch things that they already agree with.

As I said earlier, I think PBS & NPR are primed to take on this kind of role. Personally I would love some more non-profit news reporting organizations.

This is the only correct answer.

It’s easy to get on and it works just like Twitter. People don’t even need to understand what Federation is to get up and running on the platform.

There’s nothing wrong with buying early access games. You as a buyer just need to be happy with the current state of the game at the time of purchase.

I don’t know any Korean, but the Korean alphabet is by far the best writing system I’ve seen.

The characters make the shape your mouth makes while annunciating that letter. It’s ingenious.