• 0 Posts
  • 99 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 27th, 2025

help-circle







  • If you reward rightward shifts with your vote just as well as you reward leftward shifts. Why would they ever move left, instead of banking your vote and trying to secure more and more rightist votes by moving right? How do you beat fascism by marching along a fascist line?

    That fight looks like placing your line in the sand, and once it is crossed those on the other side are your enemies, lest you end up following and drawing new meaningless lines.

    That fight looks like working within your communities to spread education and recognition about who those enemies are, and building structure in your community so that when the enemy is identified you can work together to ensure the enemy feels your resistance.

    After which, they may just cross that line back over, recognizing that you now see them as an enemy and not an ally, and that they need you if they wish to have success.

    If they don’t, then that just further reveals their intention was always to march rightward regardless, the only difference is you are no longer marching alongside them and have instead set the groundwork for opposing fascist enemies.


  • “Pay attention in school, kids, lest you miss learning what a king is”

    ~ defender of kings prior to their overthrow.

    “Pay attention in school kids, lest you miss learning what an autocratic dictatorship is”

    ~ Cuban Batista defenders prior to the revolution.

    “Pay attention in school slaves, lest you miss learning what a slave master is”

    ~ Southern slaveholder prior to the abolition of slavery.

    Yes, when you confine your thinking to only exist within the current system, thats all you can comprehend.

    Here’s the thing though, when the choice is between two slides towards fascism, A steep one, and a slightly less but still increasingly steep as you descend one, the only way to escape fascism is not to choose which slide you take, but to build an off ramp.

    You will not defeat the system from working within, you need to build external power structures.




  • IttihadChe@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.ml"They're the same picture"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    1. How does it provide any further perspective? “They actually don’t deserve their land because they were colonized by the British”?

    2. Why would you expect the Palestinians to accept a plan to give half of their land away to a violent colonial expansionist ideology. Should Poland have peacefully given half their land to Germany to avoid the invasion? Do you really think that would work anyway, or is it just an excuse to blame the victims for their own genocide?

    Edit: Also, since then Palestine has called for the partition borders to be enforced, and Israel/their allies were the ones to deny it. Israel only ever supported the plan as a means to an end, further colonial expansion.


  • "U.S. President George Bush today signed into law the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, which is intended to intimidate countries that ratify the treaty for the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the “Hague invasion clause,” has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.

    In addition, the law provides for the withdrawal of U.S. military assistance from countries ratifying the ICC treaty, and restricts U.S. participation in United Nations peacekeeping unless the United States obtains immunity from prosecution. At the same time, these provisions can be waived by the president on “national interest” grounds. "

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-becomes-law





  • IttihadChe@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLike its a drag race
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I took it as: The OP is about honking instantly.

    The top of the thread is trying to justify impatiently honking immediately. “I’m impatient and idk why you aren’t moving immediately!”

    Hence my response that they could just have a slower reaction time to the light turning.

    So when you say “if the lights been green long enough”

    I reply about how “green long enough” is subjective and the thread is biased towards the an Immediate honk.


  • IttihadChe@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLike its a drag race
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The original discussion is specifically about people who honk instantly.

    Obviously at a certain point it’s not only acceptable but necessary as parking at a green light is a road hazard itself.

    You’re just accepting the altered framing from the original example to the counter example while I’m trying to keep it grounded on the original example.