I have no clue but I do have a question. If you want to mess about with window managers and ricing them (I like that as well), wouldn’t a non immutable distro be easier? It is “immutable” but it seems you want to mutate all kinds of stuff.
Cuteness enjoyer.
- 1 Post
- 32 Comments
I think that’s because the user can still fuck up their system by doing some stuff to those user files, like not managing their packages correctly. Note that for normal users anything that messes up their user experience equates to messing up “the system”. But I don’t really know, it’s just a guess. I just run a normal distro where you can mess with everything (like god intended lol).
I have been using Dash for years now as bin/sh. I couldn’t manage to get rid of Bash so it’s still installed (distro is Artix). As an interactive shell I run Fish. Dash is indeed rather terrible as an interactive shell as others have said.
Hopefully other software doesn’t follow this path, otherwise it will be practically impossible to run a distro without systemd.
I have replaced it and it just clipped in and out of a round little thing it sits in. I happened to have the right battery on hand.
I’ll make sure to replace the CMOS and use disk encryption next time. My sensitive data is encrypted separately so I’ll be fine for now. I thought that with a bios password someone couldn’t just boot from a USB on my system but clearly it only delays such actions by a minute or two.
Thank you, that makes sense. I guess it was almost dead and now it is really dead. I don’t understand how that makes Linux freak out over the login password though.
There seem to be way more people that keep saying that they hate Arch users who keep saying that they use Arch than Arch users that keep saying that they use Arch.
less or bat, but I usually use by paging up and down so it’s not that different from more… My terminal emulator only pages up and down, I like it that way.
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Atomic Linux Distros: What Barriers Stand Between You and Making the Switch?
5·1 year agoI like fucking around and finding out. I also don’t like roll backs, real men only roll forwards :)
(don’t take that too seriously please)
Artix because it is more Arch then Arch according to Arch’s own goals: “focuses on simplicity, minimalism, and code elegance”. There is no way systemd is more simple, minimal and elegant than its alternatives. I don’t think systemd is bad, but I do think it is a bad fit and Artix is what Arch should have been.
I like fish abbreviations. They are like aliases but expand when you press space or enter. That way you can edit it, and also still see the full command so you are less likely to forget it when you don’t have your aliases. Of course I have some scripts as well.
I don’t, I didn’t do it back then and I ended up using this system for much longer than I thought I would(4+ years). I want to do it next time but I don’t feel like reinstalling just for that.
I always shut it down every night, so usually not much more than 12 hours at best.
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•In 2025, what features do you want in a terminal emulator? (that currently aren't widely available or at all)
5·2 years agoMy terminal doesn’t “scroll” at all. Page up and down is all I need. I also don’t smooth scroll in my browser usually. Does it add anything? Isn’t smooth scrolling just worse actually (just like any other animation ever)?. The sooner the screen stops moving the sooner your eyes can lock on, focus and read. I never payed attention to it but you say it’s not widely supported, and that kinda makes sense to me. I can’t think of any reason to have it. I do lots of things in the terminal, I don’t even have a file manager. Smooth scrolling would make me slower and I would go crazy. Also you could scroll and end up with half a line visible on the top or bottom, which is just kinda weird and wasting space.
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Share specific examples of software built from source works better for you than packages or pre-built binaries
4·2 years ago- I build software that I changed or patched
- When the bat version in the repos was broken I just installed it with cargo which compiles the latest version
- You can get a compiled version with a ‘-git’ package from the AUR if you need the latest features not yet in a stable release
- Some pieces of software I use I made myself so they are compiled by me
- Maybe you want to install some software that is not available precompiled
- The XZ backdoor didn’t work if you compiled it yourself: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Which default software do you replace after you install your distro?
1·2 years agoPersonally I wouldn’t call that replacing. But that’s probably because I am a deranged minimalist. I can’t answer this thread because technically I didn’t remove anything that my installation started out with.
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Which default software do you replace after you install your distro?
31·2 years agoDo you really replace bash though? I also use fish but even as a relatively deranged minimalist I haven’t removed bash as it has so many dependents.
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Any APIs or apps that allow for complete keyboard navigation OS-wide, including inside apps
2·2 years agoI don’t know of any. I do like keyboard based workflows so I have VimiumC in firefox which does what you want. A tiling window manager is the solution for the desktop environment part. The tricky part is navigating existing GUI apps.
They all work using macOS’ accessibility API which exposes UI elements for programmatic interaction.
Because linux doesn’t have a unified framework because of our freedom, things like this are very tricky if not practically infeasible (at least as far as I know).
edit: There was also a thing where you divide up the screen recursively with keyboard shortcuts and when the intersection hovered over whatever you want to click you could hit a key and it would generate a mouseclick there. I forgot the name, never tried it either. But a plus is that it doesn’t need applications to implement a certain API to work so it would work system wide.

Mine is 226… Often when writing code people will adhere to max line widths such as 80 or 100. However, if you are writing a script, why not just get the width in the script and render based on that? For example
stty size,tput colsorecho "$COLUMNS".