Ive noticed its has been any activity in their github for a longtime. https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch
There are a few more info that could be added nowadays like Display Protocol (Wayland/X11) and Display size. FastFetch does this but Neofetch is globally recognized.
Fastfetch vs Neofetch
> Me, a fake Arch user who never installed both of them
Is FastFetch not? I have used it for quite some time now and afaik it is being updated.
But neofetch tells you if wayland already:
WM: Wayfire (Wayland)
Actually while neofetch detects pretty well I’m using alacritty:
Terminal: alacritty
Probably they learned
$TERM
is really meaningless if using screen or tmux, but fastfetch totally misses this and mistakenly shows screen as the terminal:Terminal: screen
The only thing I like of fastfetch over neofetch is that it’s faster, :) And yes the display missing, but I’ve never considered that something of much interest for such output… To me neofetch is just fine, and on terminal it gives you a more accurate answer… In the end is a matter of taste… But what it does is well done, :)
Screen is the terminal though?
No, screen is a terminal multiplexer, like tmux. The terminal emulator I use is alacritty.
It definitely seems abandoned. Here’s an issue in the GH repo asking the same question https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/issues/2453
There are 1.5k forks, seems like somebody could carry the torch forward if they were interested. Could be a good way to build experience and reputation.
How does it work, one requests the devs to take over the project or clones it?
i hate always having to find out years later some software i use has been unmantained for years.
there should at least be some sort of notification when this happens baked in to package managers
Yeah one of the Asahi guys was also confused about why people still use neofetch: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/111018734178152229