• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Really happy to see replaceable batteries! It’s a wear item and guaranteed to brick your device after a number of years if they aren’t replaceable.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      guaranteed to brick your device after a number of years

      But what’s the number? Also, a battery not lasting all day is hardly bricking.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think that’s an issue of semantics. If someone needs their device to last all day and it doesn’t anymore, then it is effectively bricked. Could one find a workaround to the issue? Oh probably, something as simple as lugging around a battery bank should do the trick, but ultimately users being able to just swap the battery in their device themselves isn’t a big ask. It gives a modicum of ownership back to the person who actually bought the device.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Which Bluetooth headphones last all day without topping up at all? I’m curious what a use case is that would require someone need them.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah I’m thinking of phones in this scenario. That said, both benefit from having user replaceable batteries.

  • wit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    The comments on this post are entirelly missing the point. Jesus christ lemmy. Yes, we know you like 3.5 mm jacks. That is not the point. The point is that FairPhone launched earphones with ANC with replaceable batteries. This is good!

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      A follow-up video “Why I was wrong about fairphone” by Louis Rossmann: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAogtqyN22M

      Still critical of lack of audio jack but praises FairPhone for including list of all components and board view of where each part is located and a complete schematic. In comparison to other phones manufacturers that’s night and day of repair-ability.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep. I refuse to buy a FairPhone for this simple reason: I hate bluetooth. It means I have to buy a new expensive device to get audio quality that’s worse than before and requires batteries again. Fuck that.

      I also find it ridiculous that they call themselves “fair” but making bluetooth buds probably increases pain and suffering, because more materials have to be used to make them than a simple jack headphone.

      Anti Commercial AI thingy

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t know about the fairness of this particular company but by that rationale nothing can ever be fair, just by existing we increase the suffering. Its how the world is.

        Think headphones jacks don’t cause suffering at some point in the chain?

        Not that I’m disagreeing, just not sure how things would get named under this specific scheme.

        Does it assume that it’s generally understood that everything is a little harmful in some way, so as long as you don’t claim otherwise, it’s cool or would everything need to be measured on some sort of average harmfulness scale and then include the rating in the title.

        Like “Horrendously harmful Apple” or “Mildly harmful Colgate”

        A bit hyperbolic perhaps.

        Genuinely not trying to start a fight, actually interested in what you think would be a good way of doing this, as I’ve occasionally pondered it myself and never come up with a good answer.

        Incidentally, this is one of the core plotlines to later seasons of “The good place”

        • onlinepersona@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Incidentally, this is one of the core plotlines to later seasons of “The good place”

          Aaaay! Was going to say that too 👍

          My only point is that we can work to minimize suffering. Making it necessary to purchase a new accessory adds more suffering than using an old accessory.

          Anti Commercial AI thingy

          CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • dvdnet62@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        if you hate bluetooth. USB C dongle earbuds are quite impressive nowadays like JBL or anker. no pairing

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wouldn’t trade my wireless stuff for wired ones at this point. Wireless earbuds have gotten so good that dealing with a wire would be a downgrade in most cases. When I work with mixing I always use my monitors with a wire, for obvious reasons.

      Also as an aside; any company that claims to do anything “green” is profiteering off of greenwashing. Of course making stuff environmentally friendly would become trendy in the cringe corpo world. I think the most egregious example is Apple’s autumn 2023 iPhone event. Just thinking back on it is making me cringe.

      The “greenest” product is the one that is never made to begin with.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why the fuck use wireless phones? Just use a classic wall phone you fucking dummies! Why use SSDs? Just use good ole floppies!

      Fuck sakes man, pull your head out of your ass. It’s called modernity and it’s okay

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I like wired headphones it has nothing to do with modernity but the functionality I prefer. I dislike dealing with battery life. Same reason I have a wired keyboard. Also I’ve been in power outages that lasted long enough I wished I had a wall phone to do things like let my family know I hadn’t frozen to death or to call into work to update them so I was less likely to be fired. Me wanting a company to sell wired devices doesn’t affect your ability to buy wireless devices this isn’t a zero sum game, no need to be hostile.

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fair enough. Im just tired of all the backwards rhetoric on Lemmy, wasn’t fair to direct at you. I swear this place is stuck in a time warp sometime in the 90s or early 2000s. It’s frustrating.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please, just give us back the headphone jacks!

    Or let us amputate the legs of techbros (they’re obsolete in the world of cars and electric wheelchairs).

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Starting to notice a trend with these “specialty” device companies, crap specs and high (relatively) prices.

      The FP5, released last year has a SoC that performs worse than the Tensor. The TENSOR, a chip widely regarded as shitty, and can be had on a phone 200$ cheaper. :/

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Other’s make it cheaper because they don’t care about “fair”. How do you think cheap products become cheap? Think about it for a second.

        Anti Commercial AI thingy

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can be “fair” and pricey, just put a better competitive SoC, rn it’s near budget tier for upper mid range money

          And then they expect someone to use it for 10 years? LMAO, that thing is gonna be sluggish AF in another 1 or 2 tops, can’t imagine trying to use it in 10 lolol

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can be “fair” and pricey, just put a better competitive SoC, rn it’s near budget tier for upper mid range money

            That’s the thing, fair SoC’s aren’t cheap because they aren’t available everywhere nor is a fair supply chain easy to setup. Do you think somebody just snapped their fingers or trusted the words written in a contract? "This supplier says they’re fair and ethical, so I’ll believe them 🤷 "

            Who do you think has to verify suppliers claims? Do you think they are free? Do you think a manufacturer will simply throw out an unfair supplier to be ethical and fair if that meant loss of business or revenue?

            Think about it from the extreme: are slaves cheaper than paid employees? Then continue the thoughts from there and the impacts they have on the cost and availability of products. Just walk through the logistics yourself and compare the cost of doing business ethically vs not. Maybe even write it down to get a better picture.

            Anti Commercial AI thingy

            CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Every time it comes up I must lament the switch to screens too tall to watch content, the decision to remove wired 3.5mm jacks in order to drive sales of wireless headphones, the switch to increasingly fewer physical buttons. No more IR blaster.

    • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      First thing I looked at as well. Shame. I’ll buy them when my AirPods die if they offer shipping to the us.

    • tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Their website has a page that says they “embrace open source”

      I couldn’t find the source code specifically for their app. Maybe this?

      https://github.com/fairphone/android_device_fairphone_FP5

      Honestly have no clue what I’m looking at there. There seems to be no iOS equivalent, so who knows.

      Otherwise, their app permissions seem pretty reasonable:

      • discover and pair nearby Bluetooth devices
      • Access Bluetooth settings
      • Pair with Bluetooth devices
      • connect to paired Bluetooth devices

      But yeah, if no open source, that can definitely be a deal-breaker for the market they seem to be targeting.

  • Pattyice@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    here’s hoping the next Fairphone finally launches new in the US.

    Really would love to finally use one.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cool. Their first gen Fair buds were kinda pointless. The headphones though, the Fair buds XL are excellent. I bought a pair recently and I love them.

  • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Now I just wish that they would bring their phone to a US provider that is not T-Mobile. I can’t buy their phone until it runs on a network that I can use.