For the longest time, I thought you couldn’t boot Windows on Libreboot.

  • kanzalibrary@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m really curious from this, is there any perfomance impact if we change to Libreboot? if so (boost windows performance at least up to 10%) then I’ll take it for my audio plugins set live. Really cool to see T440p Libreboot-ing here!

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Modern OS pretty much takes completely over after the preboot is done. There will be very negligible difference in the os unless the old firmware was poorly configured (fairly common, admittedly)

      • LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t you mean coreboot, as the point of Libreboot is that it’s a coreboot distro that’s as open and libre as possible

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish more laptops had the option for Libreboot or Coreboot. I’m so tired of the monopoly proprietary firmware vendors have.

    • kanzalibrary@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      +1 for this. My tech hope in 2024 is… “RISC-V has reach the perfect system for consumer level” like I installed Debian on my thinkpad laptop, without any error…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think part of the problem is that all of the modern hardware is a black box on some level or another.

    • fl42v@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      On a side note, t440p’s {core,libre}boot is not completely foss, they still use a proprietary blob for mrc (at least AFAIK). Yet it’s still way better than other options

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its because its not as simple as just freely supporting it. Frameworks CEO talks about it in a podcast on yhe idea if they fully went behind coreboot, the hardware release cycle would at least be a generation behind, and if youre a fledgling business whose main focus is environment, repair and upgradibility first, that would likely end in the bankruptcy of your business.