This is not a recommendation or a preference, it is a mandate,
ODF’s mandate is the document-layer expression of that principle, as you cannot claim digital sovereignty while allowing your documents to be locked in proprietary formats controlled by a single vendor.
incredibly based
It’s a typo, they wanted to make support of the IDF mandatory
Wouldn’t be surprised.
Probably someone tipped them off that the kids are writing “IOF”
I think this is not (entirely) true. Or at least I have some questions:
- Is this an enacted law that I missed? Because it looks like it is a work in progress.
- “All levels of government” Really? We have federalism. I am not sure, if that can be mandated by the governments.
BTW: https://deutschland-stack.gov.de/
I have searched a bit further: For federal and state governments, ODF is binding through IT Planning Council resolutions and federal guidelines, but there is no formal law yet mandating its use. Also, this is not binding for local authorities, but virtual it is.
Thank you for the effort!
Bravo. Can’t believe it has taken this long for a gov’t to realize storing everything in a poorly obfuscated format makes no sense.


