• OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not being funny but it can be both.

    Square root is an operator that maps a number to the positive number that when squared returns the original number, but there is also a square root symbol.

    Similarly, % can be an operator that maps a number x to x/100, but there’s also a percent symbol.

    It just depends if you’re talking about functions or fonts.

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s not forget that it’s also the symbol for modulo operation. So many opportunities for ambiguity!

    • asow8@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The difference between you and the people this meme is about is you understand that both space or no space are fine.

      For more context, I was trained to use a space between a number and its unit (e.g. 2 mol, 3 g, 1 M) for scientific writing. This includes the % sign when it follows a number (i.e. 100 %). So percent yields would be reported as 78 % instead of 78%. On the flip side, units that contain the % sign would not use a space. For example, mol% and wt% would not use a space to separate the % sign from the rest of the unit (i.e. 2 mol%).

      Since I was taught this from the very beginning of university, I never really questioned where the convention came from. Now, I work for a PI who does not use the space for %. Every time I write something (presentations, manuscripts, etc.), they clarify that % is a mathematical operator so there is no space. After a search to defend my position, I found the SI brochure from the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures that clearly states the use of a space.

      Recently in group meeting, while talking about something kind of related to units, they said that I believe there should be a space for %. I quickly clarified (and showed the SI brochure as evidence) that I do not “believe” there should be a space; this isn’t something I have created in my mind. Finally, they said that since it is their lab any manuscripts must follow their convention. Now when I write, I write my way and change it when I self edit before sending it to my PI.

      • flyos@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The “it’s my lab, so you follow my conventions” for a thing a silly as the space before % (and after you’ve used a rightful source to stand your point) is a very dumb power move IMO.

      • wiase@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was taught the same thing at uni (chemistry) but almost all journals in my field of work (toxicology) use no space.

    • asow8@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thank you for your comment! I had no idea what this meant, but I just looked it up. I will now be sure to use a non-breaking space from now on and look out for a number and its unit on different lines.