Government attributes decision to war crimes and human rights abuses being committed in Gaza

  • soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The title isn’t exact :

    Moreover, their relations were only re-instaured after the western-supported coup by J.Añez :

    (Here’s Colombia’s president 6 hours ago b.t.w., among other examples)

    (no need to point out that it would be safer for them not to take position for//against any side. The article also spoke of Argentina, here’s an interesting 2mn-long point of view)

  • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Basically every country, for the most part, wants to keep regular relations going with every other country. Doesn’t mean they agree with each other or really even engage in trade. They want to remain friendly and have open communications channels. Severing ties in this way means that there is no possible normal interactions between them again.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good. Only ~215 countries to go. No one should have normal interactions with Israel or anyone who supports Israel.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes and no. We live in a global world and generally all countries are seen as “equal” when it comes to international relations. So when a country specifically severs ties with another, it creates friction, normally the rest of the world can provide proxy relations, i.e. Qatar with Iran, or Turkey or Britain/Canada with Cuba or whatever. But if multiple countries stop recognizing another countries sovereignty, that can cause a lot of complications with say citizens of that country traveling and having relations.

      So even if Bolivia doesn’t deal with Israel directly, if there is an Israeli business conducting commerce within Bolivia, suddenly it becomes a lot more complicated if there is any kind of financial dispute, or some kind of international incident involving a country that Bolivia doesn’t have relations with.

      Basically the Israeli company is exposed to a lot more risk then they would be otherwise.

    • caveman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      How can it be that Muslim/Arab countries talk so much about Israel, yet it was South Africa who went to ICJ.

      I believe even though the Arab/Muslim people care about Palestinian people, but Arab/Muslim politicians don’t. They don’t give a fuck, as Israel also don’t give a fuck.

      PS: Free Palestinians!