I see these two as the main search results
Anybody here who has tried both care to give a comparison? I’m on Fedora 43 and have been using Flatpaks quite a bit over the old 3rd party yum/dns repo method for supplemental stuff like this. I guess that gives Packet a bit of an edge for now, as the rquickshare dev uses a 3rd party framework that doesn’t yet support Flatpaks. But if the consensus is that rquickshare is better then grabbing the RPM directly is an option.
You must log in or register to comment.

