ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJohnnyCanuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·23 hours agoPosts like this are a great test for whether people read the article (or even the first paragraph) before commenting.
minus-squarehumanspiral@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·22 hours agoit appears decision upheld the right to privacy, even though some, perhaps dissenting, judges and prosecutor made the headline’s argument.
minus-squareRheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-222 hours agoThe first paragraph:
minus-squareJohnnyCanuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 hours agoYeah I just figure UI can factor into that a bit more, like some apps don’t show it.
Posts like this are a great test for whether people read the article (or even the first paragraph) before commenting.
it appears decision upheld the right to privacy, even though some, perhaps dissenting, judges and prosecutor made the headline’s argument.
The first paragraph:
Hell, even the URL.
Yeah I just figure UI can factor into that a bit more, like some apps don’t show it.