hoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoMore code = more betterlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMore code = more betterlemmy.mlhoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareferric_carcinization@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoI don’t know what I was thinking. But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.
I don’t know what I was thinking.
But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.