I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s why HDMI needs to die and display port needs to take over. The TV industry is too big for that to happen of course. They make a shit ton of money off of HDMI

  • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.

    HDMI has never been an open standard (to the best of my understanding anyway). You’ve always needed to be an adopter or a member of HDMI forum to get the latest (or future) specs. So it’s not like they’ve just rejected a new idea. The rejection is fully consistent with their entire history of keeping the latest versions on lockdown.

    Standards organizations like HDMI Forum look like a monolith from the outside (like “they should explain their thinking here”) but really they are loosely coupled amalgamations of hundreds of companies, all of whom are working hard to make sure that (a) their patents are (and remain) essential, and that (b) nothing mandatory in a new version of the standard threatens their business. Think of it more like the UN General Assembly than a unified group of participants. Their likely isn’t a unified thinking other than that many Forum members are also participants in the patent licensing pool, so giving away something for which they collect royalties is just not a normal thought. Like… they’re not gonna give something away without getting something in return.

    I was a member of HDMI Forum for a brief while. Standards bodies like tihs are a bit of a weird world where motivations are often quite opaque.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      You want companies to stop supporting and using your shitty standard? Because that is how you get customers ntonstop using your standard and by extension, your companies

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It probably already has been, and Steam likely already has the specification. They just can’t open source an HDMI 2.1 implementation without consequences.

  • anon5621@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I wish we just fuck HDMI group and switch to open standard display port but we are not control of TV manufactures cause they are who crested HDMI group