• REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The claims in the South China Sea overlap. Some islands are claimed by Brunai, Malasia and the Philipines, others are claimed by the PRC and the Philipines.

      The military bases are less because of claims but because the US is sending its warships through this area all the time in a “nice trade routes you have here, would be sad if someone did something about them…”-move.

      Tibet was a part of China, it was essentially a warlord territory. With the warlord being the Dalai Lhama. It did not consider itself “other nation”, which is obvious from the fact that its regime did agree to join the PRC. Both sides came to an accord regarding the conditions, most importantly Tibet had to abolish slavery within a agreed uppon timeframe. The Lhama regime did not do so, thus peaceful unification was off the table and the PLA did the unifying.

        • REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You first point is such a vapid one. China is a multi cultural state, lots of different cultures and languages. The governemnt of the region back then clearly did not consider it important enough, because they were fine with joining China.

        • ليتني كوري شمالي @lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tibet has been a part of China longer than Ohio has been a part of the US. It is clear which indigenous people did better and which practically don’t exist anymore.